I was amused to see Klingon on the
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.1.0/ page ;-)
Yes, I realize it’s primarily me and maybe a few other geeks, but I still
smiled.
[cid:image001.png@01CD1178.97471C20]
- Shawn
http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnste
inline: image001.png
2012-04-03 19:03, Shawn Steele wrote:
I was amused to see Klingon on the
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.1.0/ page ;-)
Yes, I realize it’s primarily me and maybe a few other geeks, but I
still smiled.
On the other hand, it sets a bad example: an illogical mix of language,
with all
April 3rd, missed by a few days ☺
My assumption is the page uses JS to get the dates? Since my user locale
happened to be set to Klingon, that’s what it displayed. But it was not the
first place I expected to see Klingon
-Shawn
From: ver...@gmail.com [mailto:ver...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
When was that published on the Unicode website ? On April 1st ?
Le 3 avril 2012 18:03, Shawn Steele shawn.ste...@microsoft.com a écrit :
I was amused to see Klingon on the
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.1.0/ page ;-)
** **
Yes, I realize it’s primarily me and maybe a few
On 4/3/2012 9:51 AM, Shawn Steele wrote:
My assumption is the page uses JS to get the dates? Since my user
locale happened to be set to Klingon, that’s what it displayed.
Exactly. There is a call to:
Date(document.lastModified).toLocaleString() in the Javascript.
So for those who assumed
On 4/3/2012 11:14 AM, Ken Whistler wrote:
On 4/3/2012 9:51 AM, Shawn Steele wrote:
My assumption is the page uses JS to get the dates? Since my user
locale happened to be set to Klingon, that’s what it displayed.
Exactly. There is a call to:
Date(document.lastModified).toLocaleString() in
When the document is in English, it doesn't make sens to display the footer
date in the system locale.
The locale used for this function should either be that of site, or that of
the page.
After all we wouldn’t want a Unicode page to appear like it got contaminated
with Klingon ;-)
-Shawn
Asmus opined:
I think Yucca has a point.
When the document is in English, it doesn't make sens to display the footer
date in the system locale.
The locale used for this function should either be that of site, or that of the
page.
AP And hence the work to internationalize JavaScript and
Le 3 avril 2012 21:28, Phillips, Addison addi...@lab126.com a écrit :
Asmus opined:
I think Yucca has a point.
When the document is in English, it doesn't make sens to display the footer
date in the system locale.
The locale used for this function should either be that of site, or that of
If the visible display of the value of the Last-Modified header (which
may or may not reflect the actual last modification time) is regarded as
useful, it should of course be in the same language as the rest of the
page.
I completely disagree. There may be many applications and web pages that
The Last-Modified' header of HTTP is not supposed to be translated,
it has a documented format independant of the locale used by the
server, by the browser, or prefered by the user and configured in its
browser settings or in his personnal account of the website.
It is an hidden ***protocol
On 4/3/2012 1:49 PM, Elsebeth Flarup wrote:
If the visible display of the value of the Last-Modified header
(which may or may not reflect the actual last modification time) is
regarded as useful, it should of course be in the same language as the
rest of the page.
I completely disagree.
Yes but HTTP headers are still not part of the page content itself. It
is unrelated and only needed for the HTTP protocol and management of
caches inclding in proxies. Those headers are by definition not
translatable by the server. Only the brower may opt to display these
headers outside of the
On 04/02/2012 04:05 AM, mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote:
I appreciate your careful attitude considering the possibility
that the found short vertical strings are formed under the
influence of Chinese typography.
So, for further discussion, we need an UCS Yi materials with
vertical text that
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:53:51 -0700
fantasai fantasai.li...@inkedblade.net wrote:
On 04/02/2012 04:05 AM, mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote:
I appreciate your careful attitude considering the possibility
that the found short vertical strings are formed under the
influence of Chinese typography.
http://unicode.org/policies/stability_policy.html says that effective
starting in Version 2.0, Canonical mappings (Decomposition_Mapping
property values) are always limited either to a single value or to a
pair. The second character in the pair cannot itself have a canonical
mapping.
I
16 matches
Mail list logo
