test. pls. ignore. A./
___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
On 12/23/2014 1:51 PM, Doug Ewell wrote:
William_J_G Overington
wrote:
5. Are the proposed characters in current use by the user community?
No
This appears to be a major change in encoding policy.
This, in my opinion, is a welcome, progressive change in policy that
allows new characters f
On 2014/12/24 09:50, Tex Texin wrote:
True, however as William points out, apparently the rules have changed,
I hope the rules get clarified to clearly state that these are exceptions.
so it isn’t unreasonable to ask again whether the rules now allow it, or if
people that dismissed the idea
True, however as William points out, apparently the rules have changed, so it
isn’t unreasonable to ask again whether the rules now allow it, or if people
that dismissed the idea in the past would now consider it.
Personally, I think this is the wrong place for it, and as has been suggested
Mr. Overington,
The question of support for localizable sentences has been raised by you on
several occasions. For a number of valid reasons, It has never received any
noticeable support, let alone the kind of support that you are asking for now.
Sincerely,
Erkki I. Kolehmainen
Til
William_J_G Overington
wrote:
> 5. Are the proposed characters in current use by the user community?
> No
>
> This appears to be a major change in encoding policy.
> This, in my opinion, is a welcome, progressive change in policy that
> allows new characters for use in a pure electronic tech
Unicode encoding policy
There is a document.
http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2014/14250.htm
Within the document, the following are interesting items.
E.1.7 Emoji Additions: popular requests [Edberg, Davis, L2/14-272]
Discussion. UTC took no action at this time.
Later, in the same document is the followi
7 matches
Mail list logo
