Le 30/01/2015 17:55, Ken Shirriff a écrit :
I'm writing about the IBM 1401 and there's one character from its
character set that I couldn't find in Unicode: the group mark. The
group mark is three horizontal lines with a vertical line through it
(see attached image). This character is used in v
Le 30/01/15 18:30, Jean-François Colson a écrit :
Le 30/01/15 17:55, Ken Shirriff a écrit :
I'm writing about the IBM 1401 and there's one character from its
character set that I couldn't find in Unicode: the group mark. The
group mark is three horizontal lines with a vertical line through it
There may be something like it in the math symbols sets, but if there's
not, please feel free to submit a proposal.
On Jan 30, 2015 8:59 AM, "Ken Shirriff" wrote:
> I'm writing about the IBM 1401 and there's one character from its
> character set that I couldn't find in Unicode: the group mark. T
I'm writing about the IBM 1401 and there's one character from its character
set that I couldn't find in Unicode: the group mark. The group mark is
three horizontal lines with a vertical line through it (see attached
image). This character is used in various books and publications, so it's a
"real"
2015-01-30 9:32 GMT+01:00 Mark Davis ☕️ :
> 2. Also, the following 2 rules are not equivalent:
>
> a) Any × (Format | Extend)
> b) X (Extend | Format)* → X
>
That's what I replied in the first message but using an "as if" which was
not clear enough, my seconde reply reformulated it by making cle
I apology in advance that I'm running low on time, and didn't go through
all the messages on this thread carefully. So I may not be fully
appreciating people's positions. I'm just making some quick points about 2
items that caught my eye.
1. There are certainly times where two rules in sequence m
6 matches
Mail list logo
