Re: Devanagari and Subscript and Superscript

I missed this yesterday. Plug Gulp wrote: > General support for all characters, words and sentences could be > achieved by just three new formatting characters, e.g. SCR, SUP and > SUB, similar to the way other formatting characters such as ZWS, ZWJ, > ZWNJ etc are defined. The new formatting

Re: Hentaigana proposal

I like the more descriptive names, but I'd like to have this data available in some supplementary table available anyway, regardless of the naming scheme. 2015-12-16 16:17 GMT-02:00 Garth Wallace : > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Nicolas Tranter >

Re: Hentaigana proposal

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Nicolas Tranter wrote: > I comment as a western Japanologist who teaches and researches using > hentaigana. I have published with hentaigana using image files (resulting in > two publisher errors) and will publish next year with

Re: Devanagari and Subscript and Superscript

2015-12-16 19:16 GMT+01:00 Doug Ewell : > The ones you suggest are stateful; they affect the rendering of > arbitrary amounts of subsequent data, in a way reminiscent of ECMA-48 > ("ANSI") attribute switching, or ISO 2022 character-set switching. > Unicode tries hard to avoid