Word uses sort orders provided by the system, so if it is not there, you
wouldn't be able to use it.
Same with additional language IDs - the system defines a set of
languages which Word is using.
Windows XP was shipped well before Unicode 4.0 came out, and Word2003
was shipped just after Unicode
If you are on the Windows platform, look at mlang.dll, and at the
IMultiLanguage2 and IMultiLanguage3 APIs, which provide this service. As
others have noted you will get false detections with too little or
ambiguous data, but you may be quite surprised at just how accurate this
detection is (someti
Title: RE: MS Windows and Unicode 4.0 ?
A few corrections to your version of history below +++
Chris Pratley
Group Program Manager,
Microsoft Word, Publisher, OneNote
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Philippe
Did you solve your problem? I opened both of these documents into IE,
clicked the "Edit in Microsoft Word" button for each, and they imported
correctly, with the Japanese displaying fine.
In the first test file, the last letter of your name at the bottom is
not correctly encoded in UTF-8 so it doe
t, you
can use ExtB fonts, such as the one in the Office XP Proofing
Tools.
Chris
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sun 3/23/2003 12:18 AMTo: Chris
PratleyCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: CJK
question
Chris Pratley wrote,> Win2000 can be made to support
Win2000 can be made to
support Ext B characters. Download the support package at:
http://www.microsoft.com/china/windows2000/downloads/18030.asp
Office2000 does NOT support Ext B or any Unicode characters above
plane 0, but OfficeXP does.
The Proofing Tools for Office2000 naturally do no
If you put the bytes "00" and "41 in the file in that order, and expect
LATIN CAPTIAL LETTER A, then that is assuming a text file encoding of
UCS-2/UTF-16, and a byte order of MSB first, LSB second. Word calls that
encoding "Unicode (big-endian)". You can use Word2000 or Word2002 to
open that file
You should always set as much info correctly in the font as you can.
What you are seeing are the results of some workarounds we had to
implement to handle poorly made fonts.
Chris
MS Word
Sent with Office11 on WindowsXP
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Mercier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
done right I need your help!
Thanks in advance,
Chris Pratley
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Word
Sent with OfficeXP on WindowsXP
ent with OfficeXP on WindowsXP
-Original Message-
From: Martin Kochanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: March 14, 2002 00:47
To: Chris Pratley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Keyboard Layouts for Office XP in Windows 98
At 21:47 13/03/02 -0800, Chris Pratley wrote:
>If you'
Kochanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: March 12, 2002 00:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Keyboard Layouts for Office XP in Windows 98
At 17:34 11/03/02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On 03/11/2002 12:58:16 AM "Chris Pratley" wrote:
>
>>While it is true that in
Durdin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Vladimir Ivanov; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Chris Pratley; Michael Everson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Keyboard Layouts for Office XP in WIndows 98
At 08:20 PM 9/03/2002 +0300, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>Should we wait for Key
ows codepages Windows codepages
I'm hoping that when Office dotNet appears that support for WM_UNICHAR
will have been added to other apps in the Office suite. (Chris Pratley,
can you comment on that?)
- Peter
---
A correction on Murray's comment: Note that Word2002 handles all of
these types of line breaks (CRLF, LF, CR, and PS) and roundtrips them so
that your LF-only text file remains LF after editing.
I have to agree that Word is not in the class of "system default
editors"
Chris
Group Program Manager
Even better, use Word2002 and get all that, plus the ability to *edit*
the file and then save it back in any encoding, controlling CRLF/LF/CR
or whatever...
Actually, this problem of remembering encoding is not specific to
notepad - it happens for any text editor. The issue is that often the
enco
Perhaps that was true of NT4. On WindowsXP NTFS uses UTF-16 - it handles
Extension B filenames just fine.
Chris
Sent with OfficeXP on WindowsXP
-Original Message-
From: John Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 19, 2002 5:04 AM
To: David Hopwood
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
Microsoft applications use both of these to try to determine if a font
is likely to support a certain range. Some fonts do not properly set
those values but most do, especially common ones.
Chris Pratley
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Office
Sent with OfficeXP on WindowsXP
-Original
Um, best to check the license agreement in Project. Sorry, I have little
to do with them.
Sent with OfficeXP final release
-Original Message-
From: Tex Texin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: October 18, 2001 11:23 PM
To: Chris Pratley
Cc: Michael (michka) Kaplan; Unicoders; NE
The Office system is more like a form of B, maybe B+. When looking for substitute
fonts, we actually try to match by font style (Sans serif, etc.). Frankly this is more
than enough for what is really a fallback mechanism.
FWIW, "A" sounds nice and I can imagine some niche cases where one might
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: October 18, 2001 5:46 PM
To: Chris Pratley
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Windows/Office XP question
"Chris Pratley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are fonts available for download from Microsoft that cover
> much of CJK Ext A and Ex
I believe MS Project ships with several webparts for use in IE. These
are probably Unicode enabled.
Sent with OfficeXP final release
-Original Message-
From: Michael (michka) Kaplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: October 18, 2001 6:00 PM
To: Tex Texin
Cc: Unicoders; NE Localization S
Yes, Office2000 and OfficeXp do this too (better in XP), and IE has also
done it for several years (at least since IE5). For example with
Word2002 from OfficeXp, try typing any assigned Unicode value in hex
(e.g. U+15b4, or even 20456) then type "Alt-x". You'll see font fix-up
in action, provided
All the Microsoft TrueType fonts are Unicode, and the repertoires that each of them
cover are added to over time. (usually in small groups of characters in order to fully
support regions such as the former soviet republics, etc.)
If you are referring specifically to Arial Unicode MS, the curren
p their investment - this font is far
more expensive than typical fonts)
Thanks,
Chris
Sent with OfficeXP final release
-Original Message-
From: Mike Lischke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: August 4, 2001 7:31 AM
To: Chris Pratley; Magda Danish (Unicode); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: m
is
always as fast or faster than non-Unicode processing.
Chris Pratley
Grpoup Program Manager
Microsoft Word
Sent with OfficeXP final release
-Original Message-
From: Murray Sargent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: August 1, 2001 9:13 AM
To: Richard, Francois M; [EMAIL PROTECTE
The font Arial Unicode MS is not free for download. You must be a
licensed user of an Office Family product from the 2000 or XP
generation. If you have Office2000 or OfficeXp, Arial Unicode MS comes
on the CD of the product. If you have Publisher2000, you can go to
http://office.microsoft.com and
-Original Message-
From: Jungshik Shin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: July 16, 2001 7:30 PM
To: Chris Pratley
Cc: Seuk Soo Sung; Unicode Mailing List
Subject: Cicero and TSF(was RE: Wordprocessors in Korean)
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Chris Pratley wrote:
> From: Seuk Soo Sung [mailto:[EM
al release
-Original Message-
From: Seuk Soo Sung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: July 16, 2001 6:04 AM
To: Chris Pratley; Jungshik Shin
Cc: Unicode Mailing List
Subject: RE: Wordprocessors in Korean
First of all, sorry for long mail. If you are not interesting Korean
Wordprocessor, please
eaker I do not really understand the complexities of
the arguments involved since they seem mainly philosophical and very
passionate.
BTW, do you have any details on what you described as limitations for
Word in Korean word processing?
Chris Pratley
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Word
Sent usin
k for the last 6
years, I know how much Word has improved in that area, so I am sure that
at least some of the complaints have been addressed.
Chris Pratley
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Word
Sent with OfficeXP final release
-Original Message-
From: Jungshik Shin [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
more.
(and sometimes earlier, often to their and others' significant detriment
:-))
Chris Pratley
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Word
Sent with OfficeXP final release
-Original Message-
From: Michael (michka) Kaplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: July 9, 2001 12:26 PM
To: Unicode L
SP2 release of Office2000. If you have that and
are still seeing the problem, then the problem did not get fixed. If you
have just the initial release version, try installing SR1.
Word2002 (from OfficeXP) handles surrogates correctly. Word2002 also
handles Alt-x directly in the document.
Chris
1
support for "surrogates", display, editing, etc. What's not to like? :)
Chris Pratley
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Word
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 5:43 AM
To: Unicode List
Subject: RE: Unicode marke
claim that they do not
see the set of Chinese characters as bounded, even if one were to go through
all ancient texts. It is the job of the UTC to make a call on newly proposed
characters - hopefully their number will be few.
Chris Pratley
Microsoft
Sent with Office10 2302 wordmail on
-Orig
Both IE 5.x and Word2000 can do these conversions for text files. Just open
the file, and do a save as, then pick the encoding. (For Word2000, pick
"encoded text" as the file type for saving).
Chris Pratley
-Original Message-
From: Wong YenChin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
This font looks like a classic latin-1 hack font. The upper and lowercase
Latin glyphs have been switched for Burmese.
Chris Pratley
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Word
Sent with Office10 2216 wordmail on
-Original Message-
From: John Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: October
egacy installed base is now more Unicode than not by a wide margin (for
Office, not Windows).
Chris Pratley
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Word
Sent with Office10 build2209 wordmail on
-Original Message-
From: Doug Ewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: October 16, 2000 7:23 PM
To: Un
The Office team does not make the solution we developed internally for our
own applications available publicly for several reasons:
1. It takes time to extract the code
2. Its priority is always low since it does not help Office
3. The application teams are not in the business of Win32 developer s
2125
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Hay-Roe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: October 3, 2000 1:52 PM
To: Unicode List
Subject: RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc?
Chris Pratley wrote:
>Surrogate support was not turned on by default in Win2000 because the
>Windows team
" by waving the mouse
past the ends of both words, then backing up. I never would have guessed the
behavior, but it seems to work. Thanks!
Mark
- Original Message -
From: Chris Pratley
To: 'Mark Davis' ; Unicode List
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 13:12
Subject: RE: [OT]
to between the "fo" by
waving the mouse past the ends of both words, then backing up. I never would
have guessed the behavior, but it seems to work. Thanks!
Mark
-
Original Message -
From: Chris
Pratley
To: 'Mark Davis'
Surrogate support was not turned on by default in Win2000 because the
Windows team was waiting for the standard to be finalized. It was also added
late, so to reduce the potential impact they had it off - a safe bet since
the standard was still 1+ years from completion.
Chris
Sent with office10
off.
Word handles the spacing between words so I just type.
Sorry
I can’t help you with the other products Mark. Maybe someone else knows…
Chris
Pratley
Group
Program Manager
Microsoft
Word
Sent with office10 2125
-Original
Message-
From: Mark Davis [mailto:[EMAIL
;t have enough time to get the Thai/Indic in the global
release, that's all. That's why Peter's comparison works the way it does
now, and won't work that way next year when Word10 is available.
Chris Pratley
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Word
Sent with Office10 build 2118 wo
u can then save as any encoding by doing File/Save
As/Encoded text.
Chris Pratley
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Word
-Original Message-
From: viswanathan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06,
2000 10:26 PM
To: Unicode List
Subject: Converter for
I assume there is a typo below,
and that you mean when you type “ma2”, you want only choices that are “ma2”, and
not ma3”, “mashang”, etc.
When I use MS Pinyin 2.0 IME on
Win2000, I get exactly 4 candidates when I input “ma2”: 麻
(U+9ebb) 吗 (U+5417) 蟆 (U+87c6) 蔴
(U+8534). Each of these
Arial Unicode MS uses CJK glyphs from various cultural
styles, so if you need a “pure” font, you would be better off using a font that
specifically targets a particular locale e.g. MingliU for Traditional Chinese,
and Simsun for Simplified Chinese. Both of these come with Office2000.
R
You need to install NT4 SP5 or later to fix this.
Sent with Office2000 SR1 wordmail
-Original Message-
From: Dara Becker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 2:45 PM
To: Unicode List
Subject: Arial Unicode MS
Does anybody else have problems with Arial Unicode MS f
This makes sense if you realize that characters are just bytes, and you can
play around with the interpretation of the bytes as much as you like until
one interpretation works. Data in Unicode, however, breaks the (rough) rule
that bytes can be interpreted as any codepage. (note that this is a goo
This makes sense if you realize that characters are just bytes, and you can
play around with the interpretation of the bytes as much as you like until
one interpretation works. Data in Unicode, however, breaks the (rough) rule
that bytes can be interpreted as any codepage. (note that this is a goo
t, then look on the Format menu under
Asian layout. Save the result as HTML)
Chris Pratley
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Word
Sent with office10ship build 1829 wordmail on
-Original Message-
From: Christopher John Fynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: July 2, 2000 11:46 AM
To: Unicode L
a few
years ago in any case.
Chris Pratley
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Word
Sent with office10ship build 1829 wordmail on
-Original Message-
From: Michael (michka) Kaplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: July 3, 2000 1:52 PM
To: Chris Pratley; Unicode List
Subject: Re: Mixing languag
xpress 4/5,
etc.). There is almost no documentation in English on how to use IMEs that I
know of. The Office2000 Proofing Tools manual has one page for each
language, but comprehensive documentation in English does not exist that I
know of (I would love to be proven wrong).
Chris Pratley
Group Progr
Language Settings applet, then in Word got
to “Tools/Options/General/English Word 6.0/95 documents contain”,
and select Chinese. In PowerPoint, go to Tools/Options/Asian/Convert
font-associated text”)
Chris
Pratley
Group
Program Manager
Microsoft
Word
-Original Message
Small note: All language flavours of Win2000 include the Indic support and
input methods Chris describes, not just the one shipped in India.
Chris Pratley
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Word
-Original Message-
From: Christopher John Fynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: June 18, 2000 4
55 matches
Mail list logo
