Subject: RE: current version of unicode-font
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 at 07:51:42 -0800, Peter Constable wrote:
The most recently shipped version is 1.01, which ships with Office 2003.
... and Office 2004 doesn't ship with Arial Unicode MS at all!
Kevin
list moderated by you and invite people to join
it on a voluntary basis. I'm sure Rick McGowan and Sarasvati would have had no
objection to such a posting. (I'm sure they will also allow this one!)
Kevin Brown
of the most
important international cooperative projects this
planet has ever seen.
Kevin Brown
I've just noticed that the script l character (U+2113) is one of only
two apparently mandatory characters (the other being estimated U+212E)
included in addition to the MacOS Roman character set in a collection of
recently released Linotype fonts.
Is there any other common usage for U+2113
Adam Twardoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't matter whether a ligature is mandatory or not. Ligatures should
not be encoded _at all_, and these encoded in the Alphabetic Presentation
Forms are an uncomfortable compromise, and exception.
I completely accept that the vast majority of
This has possibly been canvassed before, but I was wondering why there is
no character LATIN SMALL LIGATURE CT in Alphabetic Presentation Forms (or
elsewhere)?
The Alphabetic Presentation Forms range contains most of the other latin
ligatures such as st, ff, fi, fl etc. I would have thought
On 27/10/03 3:13 AM, Simon Butcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was taught at school that the double-bar form was used when Australia
switched to decimal currency in 1966, and that it was incorrect to write
the single-bar form when referring to Australian dollars. I guess the
single-bar form
Further to my earlier reply to Simon Baker about the correct symbol for
the Australian dollar, the official position is documented at
http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/0/c7103f5100c7663fca2569de00293f3c?
OpenDocument.
Regarding the currency symbols, the specific recommendation of
Jain, Pankaj (MED, TCS) wrote:
I am generating the PDF using XSLFO/FOP and Arial Unicode MS font
for Global languages.And during Implementation I found that Bold/Italics
character are not appearing in bold/Italic in PDF which was coming
there is any Issue with Arial Unicode Font for
Does the Unicode Standard specify an upper limit to the length of a
character's Unicode Name?
Kevin
I assume the 64 hexagrams in Unicode 4 (Beta) from U+4DCB-U+4DFF are
indeed the hexagrams of the I-Ching?
If so, I need to relate the proposed codepoints and names (eg
4DCBHEXAGRAM FOR STANDSTILL) to actual glyphs I already have in a font
database. Is there a draft Code Chart illustrating
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
Does anyone know of a Latin-based language in which it is possible to
have a lowercase immediately followed by an uppercase in the SAME word?
In addition to the examples pointed out by Roozbeh and Michael,
this pattern is growing increasingly
I'm working on a Latin-based font that's got a large number of kerning
pairs already defined and I'm trying to pare this list of pairs down to
the bare minimum. There seem to be many pairs which are unlikely ever to
be used. These pairs all involve a lowercase on the left with an
uppercase on
a place name that uses the LOWERCASE
h with line below.
Can anyone clear up this mystery?
Kevin Brown
List and/or the Code Charts need updating???!!!
Kevin Brown
15 matches
Mail list logo
