Mark Davis wrote:
All comments are reviewed at the next UTC meeting. Due to the volume, we
don't reply to each and every one what the disposition was. If actions were
taken, they are recorded in the minutes of the meetings.
But what if an action was not taken. Do I have to keep reporting a
Rick McGowan wrote:
If you have comments for official UTC consideration, please post them by
submitting your comments through our feedback reporting page:
http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html
Hi Rick,
Please tell us, why does one never get feedback on submitted comments regarding
Public
Don't know if this has been asked/reported before, but is the example code
for hangul composition in UAX 15 correct?
The code is:
public static String composeHangul(String source) {
int len = source.length();
if (len == 0) return ;
StringBuffer result = new
Hi,
Is there somebody out there who can answer this question?
Casing context Final_Sigma is being used in SpecialCasing.txt, but its
specification is no longer present in the standard (at least I can't
find it). Obviously this context is now called Final_Cased, but the
specification for
Hi,
Casing context Final_Sigma is being used in SpecialCasing.txt, but its
specification is no longer present in the standard (at least I can't
find it). Obviously this context is now called Final_Cased, but the
specification for Final_Cased (section 3.13) is not identical to that
of Final_Sigma
According to the definition a base character is:
A character that does not graphically combine with
preceding characters, and that is neither a control
nor a format character.
What is this expressed in terms of properties?
Something like this? cc==0 AND GG!=Cc AND GC!=Cf AND GC!=Cn
Theo
.
Please check it out. Feedback is welcome.
Regards,
Theo Veenker
Tom Emerson wrote:
Philippe Verdy writes:
Symbolic links is a bad idea on FTP. They are resolved by the client...
Really? Depends on your server: proftpd handles them fine.
I think it would also give the false feeling that a new 4.01 file
exist when in fact it's the same as 4.00.
No, the
Asmus Freytag wrote:
At 08:42 AM 4/19/2004, Theo Veenker wrote:
Hi,
Until now I always downloaded the lastest version of the UCD
and worked with that. Now I want to download the UCD files for
4.0.0 again. I know it is all in http://www.unicode.org/Public/-
4.0-Update/, but in http
Hi,
Until now I always downloaded the lastest version of the UCD
and worked with that. Now I want to download the UCD files for
4.0.0 again. I know it is all in http://www.unicode.org/Public/-
4.0-Update/, but in http://www.unicode.org/ucd/ I read this:
The complete set of all files for a given
Marco Cimarosti wrote:
John Aurelio Cowan wrote:)
Marco Cimarosti scripsit:
Talking about the format of mapping tables, I always
wondered why not using ranges. In the case of ISO
8859-11, the table would become as compact as
three lines:
Well, that wins for 8859-1 and 8859-11
Hi,
I have a few questions regarding unicode regular expressions.
1) I'm working on a regexp matcher and I'd like to know which properties
are never needed in a \p{...} item. Currently I have included the properties
listed below, but for efficiency reasons I'd like to trough out what isn't
andreas palsson wrote:
Hi.
I would just like to know if someone could give me a tip on how to
structure all the unicode-information in memory?
All the UNIDATA does contain quite a bit of information and I can't see
any obvious method of which is memory-efficient and gives fast access.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theo's comment leads me to a question I've pondered recently:
Assumptions:
Many apps, from independent sources, need to access the Unicode
character data,
A lot of these apps aren't overly concerned with the slight overhead of
parsing the data as
Hi,
I'd like to know if there is something like a longest
grapheme length. From the UTR-18 I see there is no limit,
but in practice, can someone give an estimate of howmany
code points a longest grapheme would occupy, roughly?
Theo
Hi all,
I'd like to make a few remarks about the UCD files.
The following things I ran into when checking out the 3.2.0 release:
o In PropertyValueAliases-3.2.0.txt line 79:
ccc; 202; ATBL ; Attached_Below_Left
whereas in UnicodeData-3.2.0.html I read:
200: Below left
Hi all,
Suppose I want to enable mnemonic input in my software. Using
mnemonics allows one to write e' (of course embedded in some
escape sequence) instead of \u00e9 or eacute; Which sets of
mnemonics are being used or should I use? I found the ISO-10646
charmap file which gives mnemonic.ds
Marco Cimarosti wrote:
Ooops!
Of course, I was replying to a different question: Does it make sense to
use mnemonics for ideographic scripts?
I hadn't even noticed you quoted the wrong question, but I understood
it anyway. Wat I meant was; I can use mnemonic characters in a plain
ASCII
.
Is this correct, or should it just read WAW?
Another question, when can I expect a new edition of the unicode book?
Regards,
Theo Veenker
19 matches
Mail list logo
