Re: Back to the subject: Folding algorithm and canonical equivalence

2004-07-19 Thread Peter Kirk
On 19/07/2004 23:23, Asmus Freytag wrote: At 01:56 PM 7/19/2004, Mark Davis wrote: You did point out an oversight; Asmus and I have been working on the issue. ‎Mark As Mark wrote, your point is taken and we've taken that onboard. However, we won't try to *edit* text on the list, that's why we

Re: Back to the subject: Folding algorithm and canonical equivalence

2004-07-19 Thread Asmus Freytag
At 01:56 PM 7/19/2004, Mark Davis wrote: You did point out an oversight; Asmus and I have been working on the issue. ‎Mark As Mark wrote, your point is taken and we've taken that onboard. However, we won't try to *edit* text on the list, that's why we are not engaging in a long discussion on the

Re: Back to the subject: Folding algorithm and canonical equivalence

2004-07-19 Thread Mark Davis
You did point out an oversight; Asmus and I have been working on the issue. âMark - Original Message - From: "Peter Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 13:21 Subject: Back to the subject:

Back to the subject: Folding algorithm and canonical equivalence

2004-07-19 Thread Peter Kirk
There has been extensive discussion in this thread on the specifics of accent and diacritic folding. But no one has answered my point, repeated below, that there seems to be a conflict between the folding algorithm (rather than the details of specific foldings) and the principle of canonical eq