At 01:20 PM 2/7/2004, Laurentiu Iancu wrote:
I noticed that a new combining character, U+1DC2 Combining Snake Below, has
been added. Just out of curiosity, what were the reasons why this character
was allocated at this code point rather than, for instance, U+0358, the last
free position in the
At 23:43 -0800 2004-02-09, Asmus Freytag wrote:
As implementers will never have to revisit them again once they
support such a block completely, it aids their work by limiting the
effects of additional character to fewer blocks.
For that reason alone, and for no other, it might be worthwhile
Asmus said:
The editors at one point had a draft allocation there and forgot that the hole
opened up when that allocation was withdrawn.
Umm. Not really.
For that reason alone, and for no other, it might be worthwhile to ask WG2 to
move that character and close the 0300 block.
Everyone
Greetings,
I noticed that a new combining character, U+1DC2 Combining Snake Below, has
been added. Just out of curiosity, what were the reasons why this character
was allocated at this code point rather than, for instance, U+0358, the last
free position in the Combining Diacritical Marks block.
At 16:20 -0500 2004-02-07, Laurentiu Iancu wrote:
Greetings,
I noticed that a new combining character, U+1DC2 Combining Snake Below, has
been added. Just out of curiosity, what were the reasons why this character
was allocated at this code point rather than, for instance, U+0358, the last
free
5 matches
Mail list logo
