and .com confusion, I had misread the initial
message that I had to retrieve back from history.
Le 1 mars 2012 08:25, Christopher Fynn chris.f...@gmail.com a écrit :
Apparently Tokelau (.tk) will also register emoji domains.
http://iwantmyname.com/domains/tk-tokelauan-domain-name-registration
, Christopher Fynn chris.f...@gmail.com a écrit :
Apparently Tokelau (.tk) will also register emoji domains.
http://iwantmyname.com/domains/tk-tokelauan-domain-name-registration-for-tokelau
Le 28 février 2012 14:25, Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 01:30:04PM +0100,
Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr wrote
a message of 54 lines which said:
But the ICANN normally has a signed contract with the registry
Certainly not. Not with the vast
On 2012/2/29 Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
We were discussing here about a domain in the .com gTLD, which is
certainly ruled by the ICANN contract.
No, we're not. We're discussing a domain in the .la ccTLD (Laos).
Actually, we're discussing in broader sense — funny characters in
Apparently Tokelau (.tk) will also register emoji domains.
http://iwantmyname.com/domains/tk-tokelauan-domain-name-registration-for-tokelau
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 09:55:11PM +0100,
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmo...@in-nomine.org wrote
a message of 14 lines which said:
So I guess they did not check the codepoint categories in their
validation step then?
Probably. People are free to ignore RFCs (or UTRs).
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 03:47:04AM +0600,
Christopher Fynn chris.f...@gmail.com wrote
a message of 7 lines which said:
Come to think of it, Unicode could probably fund itself by selling
code points for this ;-)
RFC 5241 already explored a similar idea
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5241.txt
But the ICANN normally has a signed contract with the registry that it
wil operate for the general benefit of the communities, using *fair*
commercial practice. The same contract then assumes that this will be
observed by registrars who should also operate fairly.
If a registrar sells a name that
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 01:30:04PM +0100,
Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr wrote
a message of 54 lines which said:
But the ICANN normally has a signed contract with the registry
Certainly not. Not with the vast majority of TLD (for instance, they
do not have one with .fr).
The same
On 28/02/2012, Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 03:47:04AM +0600,
Christopher Fynn chris.f...@gmail.com wrote
a message of 7 lines which said:
Come to think of it, Unicode could probably fund itself by selling
code points for this ;-)
RFC 5241 already
On 27/02/2012, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmo...@in-nomine.org wrote:
-On [20120226 21:11], Stephane Bortzmeyer (bortzme...@nic.fr) wrote:
Note that it is a direct violation of RFC 5892. U+1F4A9, being of
category So, should be DISALLOWED. The registry was wrong to accept
it.
Oh, this will
On 28/02/2012, Christopher Fynn chris.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Now isn't everyone going to want their logo encoded so they can have
a domain like this? ~ The pressure to do so could be enormous.
Come to think of it, Unicode could probably fund itself by selling
code points for this ;-)
IDN and emoji combined brings you the wonderful domain of:
http://.la/(It should be U+1F4A9.)
I don't know whether to laugh or cry at this marvel of technology. :)
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ |
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 08:22:04PM +0100,
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmo...@in-nomine.org wrote
a message of 11 lines which said:
IDN and emoji combined brings you the wonderful domain of:
Note that it is a direct violation of RFC 5892. U+1F4A9, being of
category So, should be
-On [20120226 21:11], Stephane Bortzmeyer (bortzme...@nic.fr) wrote:
Note that it is a direct violation of RFC 5892. U+1F4A9, being of
category So, should be DISALLOWED. The registry was wrong to accept
it.
Oh, this will be fun. So I guess they did not check the codepoint categories
in their
15 matches
Mail list logo
