ubject: Re: ISO 639 "duplicate" codes (was: Re: Ligatures in Turkish
and Azeri, was: Accented ij ligatures)
> On Monday, July 14, 2003 5:34 AM, Mark Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > ...
> > > Of course
> > > Java already includes some parts
On Monday, July 14, 2003 5:34 AM, Mark Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> > Of course
> > Java already includes some parts of ICU, but other things are in
> > ICU4J are difficult now to integrate in Java, simply because IBM
> > forgot to modularize ICU so that it can be integrated slowly.
>
___
http://www.macchiato.com
► “Eppur si muove” ◄
- Original Message -
From: "Philippe Verdy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 14:45
Subject: Re: ISO 639 "duplicate" codes (was: Re: Ligatures in Turkish
a
On Saturday, July 12, 2003 4:17 PM, Jony Rosenne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What has "iw" to with Hebrew?
>
> I wasn't involved with the change, but I'm glad it was done. Java and
> other systems probably still use it because they never bothered to
> check the latest version of 639. I know for
► “Eppur si muove” ◄
- Original Message -
From: "Philippe Verdy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Doug Ewell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 00:27
Subject: Re: ISO 639 "duplicate" codes (was: Re: Ligatures
Michael Everson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivit :
> At 08:11 -0400 2003-07-12, Patrick Andries wrote:
>
> >Just out of curiosity, why was « iw » deprecated ? Seems perfectly fine
to
> >me. And why was « he » chosen (Herero, Hemba, Hellenic Greek) ?
>
> Iwrit (iw), being a German transliteration of t
puter vendors.
Jony
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Andries
> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 2:12 PM
> To: Philippe Verdy; Doug Ewell
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ISO 639 "duplicate" cod
Samedi 12 juillet à 6h51, Doug Ewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivit :
> The codes "iw" for Hebrew and "in" for Indonesian were deprecated
> FOURTEEN YEARS AGO. It is not accurate or fair to refer to them as
> "duplicates" of "he" and "id". The Registration Authority deprecates
> such codes, rathe
On Saturday, July 12, 2003 6:51 AM, Doug Ewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Philippe Verdy wrote:
>
> > Good luck with ISO language codes which does not even
> > define them, and contain many duplicate codes even in
> > the Alpha-2 space (he/iw, in/id), or unprecize codes
> > matching sometimes
Philippe Verdy wrote:
> Good luck with ISO language codes which does not even
> define them, and contain many duplicate codes even in
> the Alpha-2 space (he/iw, in/id), or unprecize codes
> matching sometimes very imprecize families of languages
> overlapping other language codes...
The codes "
10 matches
Mail list logo
