Klingon? take a look

2001-02-26 Thread Dan Kolis
Regarding "Klingon"... There was doubt as to the reality of this submission. At http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n1643/n1643.htm Is this proposal, pointed to from a table at: http://www.unicode.org/unicode/alloc/Pipeline.html as "under investigation" So, literally speaking, there is at

Re: Klingon? take a look

2001-02-26 Thread Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
st" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:25 AM Subject: Klingon? take a look > Regarding "Klingon"... > > There was doubt as to the reality of this submission. At > http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n1643/n1643.htm > > Is this proposal,

Re: Klingon? take a look

2001-02-26 Thread Michael Everson
At 09:03 -0800 2001-02-26, Michael \(michka\) Kaplan wrote: >Nobody doubted the reality of the submission, we all know it is there. > >No one is really pushing for it, though. It was originally made because there was a Unix or Linux implementation somewhere. It has been seen and approved by the K

Re: Klingon? take a look

2001-02-26 Thread Nick NICHOLAS
Oh, and http://www.klingonska.org/piqad/ . Sorry. -- Nick Nicholas. TLG, UCI, USA. [EMAIL PROTECTED]; www.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis Many among their proselytes had sold their lands and houses to increase the public riches of the sect --- at the expense, indeed, of their unfortunate children, w

Re: Klingon? take a look

2001-02-26 Thread Nick NICHOLAS
qaStaHvIS Mon, 26 Feb 2001 DIS, ghItlh Michael Everson: > implementation somewhere. It has been seen and approved by the > Klingon Language Institute, but it does remain true that most users > of the Klingon language read and write it in its Latin orthography, > although they will use the font fo