Regarding "Klingon"...
There was doubt as to the reality of this submission. At
http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n1643/n1643.htm
Is this proposal, pointed to from a table at:
http://www.unicode.org/unicode/alloc/Pipeline.html
as "under investigation"
So, literally speaking, there is at
st" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:25 AM
Subject: Klingon? take a look
> Regarding "Klingon"...
>
> There was doubt as to the reality of this submission. At
> http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n1643/n1643.htm
>
> Is this proposal,
At 09:03 -0800 2001-02-26, Michael \(michka\) Kaplan wrote:
>Nobody doubted the reality of the submission, we all know it is there.
>
>No one is really pushing for it, though.
It was originally made because there was a Unix or Linux
implementation somewhere. It has been seen and approved by the
K
Oh, and http://www.klingonska.org/piqad/ . Sorry.
--
Nick Nicholas. TLG, UCI, USA. [EMAIL PROTECTED]; www.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis
Many among their proselytes had sold their lands and houses to increase
the public riches of the sect --- at the expense, indeed, of their
unfortunate children, w
qaStaHvIS Mon, 26 Feb 2001 DIS, ghItlh Michael Everson:
> implementation somewhere. It has been seen and approved by the
> Klingon Language Institute, but it does remain true that most users
> of the Klingon language read and write it in its Latin orthography,
> although they will use the font fo
5 matches
Mail list logo