Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-02-11 Thread Mark Davis
, SJ CA 95193 (408) 256-3148 fax: (408) 256-0799 - Original Message - From: "Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 18:36 Subject: Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS? > On 2003.01.28, 1

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-02-10 Thread Kenneth Whistler
John Cowan noted: > > So formal canonical decompositions are almost entirely > > confined to separable, accent-like diacritics (acute, > > grave, diaeresis, and so on). The only significant exceptions are > > the cedilla and ogonek, which attach smoothly to letter > > bottoms without otherwise dis

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-02-10 Thread Doug Ewell
Kenneth Whistler wrote: > Long ago > it was decided that it would not be a good idea to extend > formal character decomposition to such base letterform shape > changes or bars across letters. (Note that Latin characters > with bars: barred-b, barred-d, barred-i, barred-u, barred-l, > and the like

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-02-10 Thread John Cowan
Kenneth Whistler scripsit: > So formal canonical decompositions are almost entirely > confined to separable, accent-like diacritics (acute, > grave, diaeresis, and so on). The only significant exceptions are > the cedilla and ogonek, which attach smoothly to letter > bottoms without otherwise dist

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-02-10 Thread Kenneth Whistler
António MARTINS-Tuválkin (with no diaeresis !) asked: > Anyway, I noted once more that many cyrillic letters I'd consider as > "base letter + diacritical" composites are not decomposable according to > Unicode. I planned to dwell deeper into this, but is there a short > answer for it? The short a

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-02-10 Thread Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin
On 2003.01.28, 16:41, Mark Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a chart at > http://www.macchiato.com/unicode/composition_chart.html that makes it > pretty easy to find all those odd precomposed characters. A superb resource, thank you! I enjoyed especially to pan it about using Opera's zoom

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-02-03 Thread Peter_Constable
F7C7: A palatalised y is pretty unlikely (it's already palatal). Sure it's not a palatalised v? - Peter --- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Te

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-02-03 Thread Curtis Clark
Lukas Pietsch wrote: Your F725 Unknown-2, to me, looks like a German SCRIPT CAPITAL S, (compare with U+2112;SCRIPT CAPITAL L). Yes, we were taught to write an S like this in school. Perhaps it's used somewhere in mathematics? Looks to me like the proofreader's marginal deletion mark. F7AA might

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-02-03 Thread Otto Stolz
Asmus Freytag had written: I have updated my document at http://www.unicode.org/~asmus/what_is_this_character.pdf ... I welcome [...] any help anyone could provide in identifying the characters or in locating places they are used. Lukas Pietsch wrote: Your F725 Unknown-2, to me, looks like

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-02-03 Thread Asmus Freytag
Thanks for the many replies, I'll comment on a few of them: At 05:46 PM 2/2/03 +0100, Lukas Pietsch wrote: Your F725 Unknown-2, to me, looks like a German SCRIPT CAPITAL S, (compare with U+2112;SCRIPT CAPITAL L). Yes, we were taught to write an S like this in school. Perhaps it's used somewhere

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-02-02 Thread Lukas Pietsch
> All characters are now mapped to Unicoe characters or character sequences > where I felt that this was possible. If there are obvioous errors, please > point them out and I'll update the listing. > > However, there are some unidentified characters, or ones that could be > considered missing from

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-02-02 Thread jcowan
Asmus Freytag scripsit: > However, there are some unidentified characters, or ones that could be > considered missing from Unicode 4.0, or which have mappings that for one > or the other reason could be considered not ideal. These have been > highlighted. I welcome suggestions for additions to

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-02-01 Thread Asmus Freytag
I have updated my document at http://www.unicode.org/~asmus/what_is_this_character.pdf with much of the information supplied by people on this list and some others. All characters are now mapped to Unicoe characters or character sequences where I felt that this was possible. If there are obvio

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-01-29 Thread Asmus Freytag
At 11:05 AM 1/28/03 -0800, Kenneth Whistler wrote: Curtis asked: > I have a distinct memory of a precomposed Latin letter n with diaeresis > (as in the band Spinal Tap), but now I can't find it. It doesn't matter > to me whether it exists or not, other than helping me to und

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-01-28 Thread Kenneth Whistler
Curtis asked: > I have a distinct memory of a precomposed Latin letter n with diaeresis > (as in the band Spinal Tap), but now I can't find it. It doesn't matter > to me whether it exists or not, other than helping me to understand my > memory. Am I missing it? Did it

Re: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-01-28 Thread Mark Davis
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 08:14 Subject: LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS? > I have a distinct memory of a precomposed Latin letter n with diaeresis > (as in the band Spinal Tap), but now I can't find it. It doesn't matter &

LATIN LETTER N WITH DIAERESIS?

2003-01-28 Thread Curtis Clark
I have a distinct memory of a precomposed Latin letter n with diaeresis (as in the band Spinal Tap), but now I can't find it. It doesn't matter to me whether it exists or not, other than helping me to understand my memory. Am I missing it? Did it exist once and is now gone? Or am I