Re: "Missing character" glyph- example

2002-08-02 Thread Martin Kochanski
Periphrasis is always possible, of course; but that doesn't mean that it is desirable. 1. Periphrasis is by definition longer. In a page where you want to present a lot of information and not have it squeezed out by meta-information, the first paragraph in my example could read "Seeing things

Re: "Missing character" glyph- example

2002-08-01 Thread John Cowan
James Kass scripsit: > Please note that the first entry in the cmap covers Glyph ID 3. > Glyph IDs 0, 1, and 2 don't need to be covered by cmap, as they > are constants which are supposed to be handled by default. For the record, in FIGfonts the glyphs are labeled by their Unicode character numb

Re: "Missing character" glyph- example

2002-08-01 Thread James Kass
Peter Constable wrote, > ... For instance, in Times New Roman, Arial, Tahoma and even > James' own Code2000, the first entry in the cmap is for U+0020: Please note that the first entry in the cmap covers Glyph ID 3. Glyph IDs 0, 1, and 2 don't need to be covered by cmap, as they are constants

Re: "Missing character" glyph- example

2002-08-01 Thread Eric Muller
John Hudson wrote: > but it should *not* be encoded as U+ or as any other codepoint. > .notdef should be unencoded. Almost. OpenType specifies that there is no functional difference between a code point that is not mapped and a code point that is explicitly mapped to GID 0, so there is

Re: "Missing character" glyph- example

2002-08-01 Thread John Hudson
At 01:42 PM 01-08-02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I think James is mistaken on this point: the missing glyph *is* the first >glyph in any TTF, but it is *not* necessarily (probably not typically) >mapped from U+. For instance, in Times New Roman, Arial, Tahoma and >even James' own Code2000, the

Re: "Missing character" glyph- example

2002-08-01 Thread Peter_Constable
On 08/01/2002 02:34:17 PM Kenneth Whistler wrote: >But if you insist on having a code point to stick directly in >a sentence like that above, I'd take the cue from James Kass: > >> The missing glyph is the first glyph in any font. This is mapped to >> U+ and the system correctly substitutes

Re: "Missing character" glyph- example

2002-08-01 Thread Kenneth Whistler
> As a clarification, here is a sample web page: > > http://www.cardbox.com/missing.htm > > The requirement is to be able to display the first paragraph of the > page in such a way that it makes sense in its reference to the text > on the rest of the page. > > The character after the word "th

Re: "Missing character" glyph- example

2002-08-01 Thread Martin Kochanski
As a clarification, here is a sample web page: http://www.cardbox.com/missing.htm The requirement is to be able to display the first paragraph of the page in such a way that it makes sense in its reference to the text on the rest of the page. The character after the word "this:" in the first p