PRI #299 (was: Re: Adding RAINBOW FLAG to Unicode)

2015-07-03 Thread Doug Ewell
Leo Broukhis wrote: What I don't like about PRI #399 is its proposing to use default- ignorable characters. On a non-vexillology-aware platform, I'd like to see something informative, albeit not resembling a flag, but indicative of the intention to display a flag, like RIS can be, as opposed to

Re: PRI #299 (was: Re: Adding RAINBOW FLAG to Unicode)

2015-07-03 Thread Asmus Freytag (t)
On 7/3/2015 12:50 PM, Doug Ewell wrote: Leo Broukhis wrote: What I don't like about PRI #399 is its proposing to use default- ignorable characters. On a non-vexillology-aware platform, I'd like to see somethi

Re: PRI #299 (was: Re: Adding RAINBOW FLAG to Unicode)

2015-07-03 Thread Leo Broukhis
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Doug Ewell wrote: > Leo Broukhis wrote: > >> What I don't like about PRI #399 is its proposing to use default- >> ignorable characters. On a non-vexillology-aware platform, I'd like >> to see something informative, albeit not resembling a flag, but >> indicative o