On 09/09/2004 15:07, John Cowan wrote:
Peter Kirk scripsit:
Names are sometimes inaccurate, viz. ZINOR and ZARQA and the infamous
FHTORA. That doesn't change the meaning or utility of the character.
Agreed. It simply changes, indeed destroys completely, the utility of
the character nam
Peter Kirk scripsit:
> >Names are sometimes inaccurate, viz. ZINOR and ZARQA and the infamous
> >FHTORA. That doesn't change the meaning or utility of the character.
>
> Agreed. It simply changes, indeed destroys completely, the utility of
> the character name.
Not at all. As I've told you b
Andrew C. West scripsit:
> "In principle when a character of a given script is used in more than one
> language, no language name is specified. Exceptions are tolerated where an
> ambiguity would otherwise result." [N2652R Annex L Rule 9]
Indeed, but this begs the question of whether the characte
Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin wrote:
On 2004.09.09, 05:53, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FB1D, HEBREW LETTER YOD WITH HIRIQ, should be assigned to the
unknown group. It is not a Hebrew character, notwithstanding the
misleading name.
Hmmm... Are you claiming that HEBREW LETTER YOD (the base char
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 07:29:20 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>
> Jony Rosenne scripsit:
>
> > The UTC refused to add Yiddish to the name, unlike the other Yiddish
> > specialties, and I am not aware of any other possibility.
>
> Why should it? Incorporating a language name into a character name,
> as i
On 09/09/2004 13:31, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
...
Names are sometimes inaccurate, viz. ZINOR and ZARQA and the infamous
FHTORA. That doesn't change the meaning or utility of the character.
Agreed. It simply changes, indeed destroys completely, the utility of
the character name.
--
Peter Kirk
[E
Jony Rosenne wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 7:12 AM
To: Jony Rosenne
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Public Review Issue: UAX #24 Proposed Update
Jony Rosenne scripsit:
FB1D, HEBREW LETTER YOD WITH HIRIQ
Jony Rosenne scripsit:
> The UTC refused to add Yiddish to the name, unlike the other Yiddish
> specialties, and I am not aware of any other possibility.
Why should it? Incorporating a language name into a character name,
as in ABKHASIAN CHE and KHAKASSIAN CHE, is done because those languages
ha
On 09/09/2004 04:47, Jony Rosenne wrote:
FB1D, HEBREW LETTER YOD WITH HIRIQ, should be assigned to the unknown group.
It is not a Hebrew character, notwithstanding the misleading name.
Nevertheless, it is canonically equivalent to the sequence <05D9, 05B4>,
and this sequence is used in Hebrew,
At 10:23 +0300 2004-09-09, Jony Rosenne wrote:
The UTC refused to add Yiddish to the name, unlike the other Yiddish
specialties, and I am not aware of any other possibility.
This complaint is as cosmetic as it is old and tiresome.
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.c
> -Original Message-
> From: John Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 7:12 AM
> To: Jony Rosenne
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Public Review Issue: UAX #24 Proposed Update
>
>
> Jony Rosenne scripsit:
>
> >
On 2004.09.09, 05:53, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> FB1D, HEBREW LETTER YOD WITH HIRIQ, should be assigned to the
>> unknown group. It is not a Hebrew character, notwithstanding the
>> misleading name.
>
> Hmmm... Are you claiming that HEBREW LETTER YOD (the base character
> of the codepoint U+FB1
I make no such claim.
Jony
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 7:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RE: Public Review Issue: UAX #24 Proposed Update
At 06:47 +0300 2004-09-09, Jony Rosenne wrote:
FB1D, HEBREW LETTER YOD WITH HIRIQ, should be assigned to the unknown group.
It is not a Hebrew character, notwithstanding the misleading name.
Of course it is.
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
Jony wrote,
> FB1D, HEBREW LETTER YOD WITH HIRIQ, should be assigned to the
> unknown group. It is not a Hebrew character, notwithstanding the
> misleading name.
Hmmm... Are you claiming that HEBREW LETTER YOD (the base character of the
codepoint U+FB1D) is not a letter of the Hebrew script, an
Jony Rosenne scripsit:
> FB1D, HEBREW LETTER YOD WITH HIRIQ, should be assigned to the unknown group.
> It is not a Hebrew character, notwithstanding the misleading name.
To anticipate Michael: Of course it is. It's not used in the Hebrew
language, perhaps; but the Hebrew script is used for oth
FB1D, HEBREW LETTER YOD WITH HIRIQ, should be assigned to the unknown group.
It is not a Hebrew character, notwithstanding the misleading name.
Jony
The Unicode Technical Committee has posted a new issue for public review
and comment. Details are on the following web page:
http://www.unicode.org/review/
Review periods for the new items close on November 8, 2004.
Please see the page for links to discussion and relevant documents.
Brie
18 matches
Mail list logo
