On 09/02/2004 18:25, Asmus Freytag wrote:
At 04:12 PM 2/9/2004, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
That leaves item A. And it is mostly a matter of determining
what is the best mechanism for getting people to know how
they should spell the metegs with the minimum of confusion.
Putting something in the
Peter Kirk wrote:
One question here which is more of principle. Last year there was a long
discussion of the appropriate method of inhibiting undesirable canonical
reordering e.g. between meteg and vowels but potentially in other
scripts. The mechanism agreed on, I think formally by the UTC,
Was any decision made at the UTC meeting concerning Public Review Issue
#27? I ask because I am waiting to encode a text which needs to use ZWJ
and ZWNJ within combining character sequences (and for which there is
already publicly available font support!), but I don't want to do
anything which
Was any decision made at the UTC meeting concerning Public Review Issue
#27? I ask because I am waiting to encode a text which needs to use ZWJ
and ZWNJ within combining character sequences (and for which there is
already publicly available font support!), but I don't want to do
anything
On 09/02/2004 14:25, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
Was any decision made at the UTC meeting concerning Public Review Issue
#27? I ask because I am waiting to encode a text which needs to use ZWJ
and ZWNJ within combining character sequences (and for which there is
already publicly available font
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
Of Peter Kirk
The UTC decided to allow ZWJ/ZWNJ to occur in combining character
sequences.
Thank you. So I can do what I was wanting to do (Hebrew meteg
combining
sequences) with a clear conscience!
Well, perhaps there is a step
On 09/02/2004 14:37, Peter Constable wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
Of Peter Kirk
The UTC decided to allow ZWJ/ZWNJ to occur in combining character
sequences.
Thank you. So I can do what I was wanting to do (Hebrew meteg
Peter C opined:
Well, perhaps there is a step that's needed to propose representations
for the alternate positions of meteg, one of these making use of ZWJ or
ZWNJ (whichever) and to get UTC to approve that so that it's formally a
part of the standard and, hence, an interoperable
At 04:12 PM 2/9/2004, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
That leaves item A. And it is mostly a matter of determining
what is the best mechanism for getting people to know how
they should spell the metegs with the minimum of confusion.
Putting something in the Unicode Standard might be appropriate,
or there
9 matches
Mail list logo
