From: "Rick McGowan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> OK, here is another semi-official reply from me, as a UTC member, since
everyone else seems to be at the UTC meeting this week...
Technically, the presence of a person at the UTC meeting does not block
their participation. :-)
michka
Michael Kaplan
Tri
At 06:36 AM 8/8/00 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On 08/08/2000 06:40:17 AM Marco.Cimarosti wrote:
>
> >(You definitely need an official reply, but let's go on with some more
> >informal chatting.)
Just to make it official. The Unicode Consortium has a policy of no longer
changing the code lo
At 11:01 PM 8/7/00 -0800, Jianping Yang wrote:
>Not really for Unicode in which we have relocated some codepoints for Hangul
>between Unicode 1.1 and 2.0 :)
>
>Regards,
>Jianping.
>
>"Christopher J. Fynn" wrote:
>
> Allowing changes like this would break
> > existing implementations of these stan
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > E.g., if you look at the Latin part, you see that
> > the 26 letters used in
> > modern English are all contiguously ordered in
> > two areas: U0041 to U005A
> > (uppercase) and U0061 to U007A (lowercase).
>
> Yeah, but so what? All yo
--
Robert Lozyniak
Accusplit pedometer manufactures can go suck eggs
My page: http://walk.to/11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
(917) 421-3909 x1133 - voicemail/fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sandro Karumidze wrote:
> > The issue is that in Unicode there is a sequence
> of Georgian
> > carac
The question is:
> Is there any way to change already defined character codes?
And the definitive answer is "No".
Marco Cimarosti wrote:
> (You definitely need an official reply, but let's go on with some more
> informal chatting.)
OK, here is another semi-official reply from me, as a UTC mem
At 11:01 PM -0800 8/7/00, Jianping Yang wrote:
>Not really for Unicode in which we have relocated some codepoints for Hangul
>between Unicode 1.1 and 2.0 :)
>
And have regretted it ever since. Moving the Hangul and renaming æ
have caused no end of problems. It was the fact that it was so
disastr
On 08/08/2000 06:40:17 AM Marco.Cimarosti wrote:
>(You definitely need an official reply, but let's go on with some more
>informal chatting.)
All the "officials" are busy meeting this week, but the statement, "Can't
be done" is just as true whether it comes from the lips (or... fingertips)
of a
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Sandro Karumidze wrote:
> The issue is that in Unicode there is a sequence of Georgian caracters different
> from what this people think should be.
>
> In modern Georgian there are 33 widely used characters. However before there were
> 38 characters. In beginning of this cen
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Jianping Yang wrote:
> Not really for Unicode in which we have relocated some codepoints for Hangul
> between Unicode 1.1 and 2.0 :)
Yes, but NEVER AGAIN.
--
John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C'est la` pourtant que se livre le sens du dire, de c
Sandro Karumidze wrote:
> The issue is that in Unicode there is a sequence of Georgian
> caracters different
> from what this people think should be.
> [...] In beginning of this century 5 characters were dropped
> [...]
> In Unicode this 5 characters follow 33. There is a different
> point of
--- Original Message -
From: "Sandro Karumidze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 3:26 AM
Subject: Re: is there any way to change already defined character
Dear Chris,
Thank you for your answer.
> May I ask what is the reason these people from the government of Georgia want
> to change the codepoints of some Georgian characters? There is probably another
> good solution (or solutions) for whatever problem they think would be solved by
> changing en
Not really for Unicode in which we have relocated some codepoints for Hangul
between Unicode 1.1 and 2.0 :)
Regards,
Jianping.
"Christopher J. Fynn" wrote:
> Sandro
>
> I'm sure someone official will give you an official answer, but I know the only
> answer you are going to get to your question
Sandro
I'm sure someone official will give you an official answer, but I know the only
answer you are going to get to your question is NO - there is no way to change
the encoding point of a character (or to change a character name) once it is in
the Unicode or ISO 10646 standards. Allowing change
15 matches
Mail list logo
