So does my Rurouni Kensin album go under R or under ru?
Maybe ru is better because few words start with ru.
★じゅういっちゃん★
"AIS TSXQ QDOO TD AISC TDQMIG, HYCTDL,
ZIC HIIUPLB XSHM GDOPHPISX CYTDL."
"QMD XDHCDQ, AIS XDD,
PX QMDCD'X LI CDHPWD.
P VSXQ WSQ RMYQ P MYED KA TA YCT PL."
The problem with your glyph statistics is that they
are based on mould counts employed by the Monotype hot metal
typesetters.
The Monotype system was capable of extensive
kerning, and therefore many glyphs were constructed from the elements provided
by the moulds at the time of composition.
Hi.
Well, it can be said to be above the minimum :-) depending on
how you look at things. If you're a developer of embedded
device with a
really stringent requirement in memory footprint (for font
and others),
you may just go with 1:1 ratios for all three groups of Jamos
Mike Meir wrote:
The problem with your glyph statistics is that they are based
on mould counts employed by the Monotype hot metal typesetters.
I agree: no one will ever come up with *the* correct count.
Such general evaluations simply depend on too many things to be useful.
E.g.: which
Jungshik Shin wrote:
I think I know how you counted (initial consonants:
two for syllables with and without final consonants, three for three
kinds of vowel position/shape, vowels: two for syll.
with/without final consonants) and think you got it right.
You caught me with hands in jam:
Thursday, May 31, 2001
My goal was never to give a specific number of glyphs needed to display a
particular Indian or other script. As others have pointed out, this
depends among other things, on the particular display device and its font
processing
At 5:35 PM +0200 5/31/01, Marco Cimarosti wrote:
Jungshik Shin wrote:
I think I know how you counted (initial consonants:
two for syllables with and without final consonants, three for three
kinds of vowel position/shape, vowels: two for syll.
with/without final consonants) and think
At 5:12 PM +0200 5/31/01, Marco Cimarosti wrote:
Hi.
Well, it can be said to be above the minimum :-) depending on
how you look at things. If you're a developer of embedded
device with a
really stringent requirement in memory footprint (for font
and others),
you may just go with
Wednesday, May 30, 2001
Attached is a note I wrote in September 1993 about the ratio of characters
to glyphs in several Indic scripts. Much has changed on the Unicode
front since then, but I think the need for rendering software to decide
which of many
You may be interested by Creating and supporting OpenType fonts for Indic
scripts and Creating and supporting OpenType fonts for Arabic scripts, both
available at http://www.microsoft.com/typography/tt/tt.htm.
To give a little bit of context, the OpenType architecture separates shaping in
two
On Wed, 30 May 2001, James E. Agenbroad wrote:
Thank you for interesting piece of information.
Wednesday, May 30, 2001
Attached is a note I wrote in September 1993 about the ratio of characters
to glyphs in several Indic scripts. Much has changed
11 matches
Mail list logo
