On 15 July 2010 13:02, Jim Breen wrote:
> John H. Jenkins wrote:
>
>> We hope to have it back in the next few days.
Two weeks have passed, and it's still:
"The Unihan Database is down for maintenance."
Sure I can grep the text file, but it's not the same.
Jim
--
Jim Breen
Adjunct Snr Researc
John H. Jenkins wrote:
> We hope to have it back in the next few days.
Good to hear. I'm getting questions from users of my
WWWJDIC server about the extended downtime
of the Unihan database. (I link to it from the kanji
dictionary function.)
Jim
--
Jim Breen
Adjunct Snr Research Fellow, Clayto
We hope to have it back in the next few days.
On Jul 12, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Martin Heijdra wrote:
> When will Unihan be back? It has been down for quite a while now, and there
> are librarians for whom checking this is part of their workflow…
>
> Martin
=
Siôn ap-Rhisiart
John H. Jenkins
j
Martin,
-On [20100712 16:52], Martin Heijdra (mheij...@princeton.edu) wrote:
>When will Unihan be back? It has been down for quite a while now, and there are
>librarians for whom checking this is part of their workflow…
Can I offer http://www.cojak.org/ and http://www.jisho.org/kanji/radicals/
as
When will Unihan be back? It has been down for quite a while now, and there are
librarians for whom checking this is part of their workflow…
Martin
On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 10:51 AM, Raymond Mercier wrote:
Well, OK, but should you have created by now some sort of program that
checks the file whenever you make a change - a sort of spellcheck ?
Should not be too hard to write something that displays the effects of
any changes.
Ye
At 08:44 AM 12/20/2002 -0700, you wrote:
That's because the file was converted to UTF-8. Previously it had not
been in any single encoding, which was creating problems
Well, OK, but should you have created by now some sort of program that
checks the file whenever you make a change - a sort o
On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 02:50 AM, Raymond Mercier wrote:
Apart from the kMandarin errors of the kind that Andrew West has
noted, there is another corruption, namely the loss of ü, and this
happened between "3.0b1" and "3.0b2", when the ü became the two bytes
C393.
That's because th
On the errors in kMandarin:
Apart from the kMandarin errors of the kind that Andrew West has noted,
there is another corruption, namely the loss of ü, and this happened
between "3.0b1" and "3.0b2", when the ü became the two bytes C393.
As to Han/Yi, "U+6C49 YI4 HAN4" is found not only in "3.0b
On Thursday, December 19, 2002, at 06:05 AM, Andrew C. West wrote:
- Any estimates for when it will be possible publish a fixed version?
I'll let Mr. Jenkins answer that one.
Unicode 4.0 timeframe. We'll also try to get the preferred Mandarin
(and possibly Cantonese) readings marked by
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 04:58:08 -0800 (PST), Marco Cimarosti wrote:
>
> I have tried to follow the discussion about the errors in field "kMandarin"
> of file "Unihan.txt" but, after a while, I lost my way with all those
> dictionary references...
>
> Could someone kindly make a short summary of the
I have tried to follow the discussion about the errors in field "kMandarin"
of file "Unihan.txt" but, after a while, I lost my way with all those
dictionary references...
Could someone kindly make a short summary of the situation? Here are my
biggest ???'s:
- Are the errors really there?
- Any es
12 matches
Mail list logo
