On 15/08/2003 15:18, Jim Allan wrote:
Ah!
But I still see "LATIN" coming out perfectly as "LATIN" in small
capitals.
I lucked out.
Investigation shows that my system is picking up exactly the right
small capital characters from the PUA in the fonts Pigiarniq and
Pigiarniq Italic available fr
Paul Kirk posted in regards to bad characters from the Unicode PDS files:
What seems to be happening, in Windows 2000, is that the text on the
clipboard is made up of PUA character codes U+F7XX, where the XX seems
to be the corresponding ASCII code. For example, small caps "LATIN"
comes out as F76
On 14/08/2003 12:24, Eric Muller wrote:
Peter Kirk wrote:
And indeed the software being used is produced by a consortium
member. Perhaps the embarrassment should be more that member's, that
their software is not Unicode compatible.
The member in question is a company. Companies are not emba
Peter Kirk wrote:
And indeed the software being used is produced by a consortium member.
Perhaps the embarrassment should be more that member's, that their
software is not Unicode compatible.
The member in question is a company. Companies are not embarrassed nor
ashamed.
whilst implementin
On 14/08/2003 11:44, Jim Allan wrote:
Peter Kirk posted:
The documentation is great, but I have had some problems copying text
from it (with Acrobat Reader 5), in particular with text in small
capitals e.g. Unicode character names. For example, I get the following
from p.44:
The sequence of Unico
Well, I've been promising that good things would come
to those who wait. ;-)
At last, the Unicode website has been updated with the
online chapters for Unicode 4.0. See:
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode4.0.0/
Or just go to the Unicode 4.0 link from the home page.
Enjoy.
--Ken
P.S. Just
On 11/08/2003 17:37, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
P.S. Just FYI, Peter K., now it is o.k. for everyone to come
back from their August Unicode vacations. Let the
textual criticism begin!
You asked for it! Just give me a little time to read...
Peter
--
Peter Kirk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal)
[EMAIL
Peter Kirk posted:
The documentation is great, but I have had some problems copying text
from it (with Acrobat Reader 5), in particular with text in small
capitals e.g. Unicode character names. For example, I get the following
from p.44:
The sequence of Unicode characters U+0061 “a”
On 14/08/2003 10:43, Rick McGowan wrote:
Peter Kirk suggested...
Interesting and a little embarrassing that Unicode's own documentation
is not Unicode compatible!
I don't think it's very embarrassing... The Unicode consortium after all
doesn't produce book editing and typesetting softwa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Unicode 4.0 is online at
last!
ico
On 11/08/2003 17:37, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
Well, I've been promising that good things would come
to those who wait. ;-)
At last, the Unicode website has been updated with the
online chapters for Unicode 4.0. See:
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode4.0.0/
Or just go to the Unicode 4.0 link f
Peter Kirk suggested...
> Interesting and a little embarrassing that Unicode's own documentation
> is not Unicode compatible!
I don't think it's very embarrassing... The Unicode consortium after all
doesn't produce book editing and typesetting software, we use other
peoples' software.
I thin
12 matches
Mail list logo
