Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?

2000-12-21 Thread Robin Cover
Hmmm... I should not have thoughtlessly jumped into the discussion w/o knowing more about the thread, including *why* this information is perceived to be important on the Unicode list. If someone needs to know the details, for some serious research purpose, they should consult with specialists wh

Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?

2000-12-21 Thread John Hudson
At 08:13 PM 12/21/2000 -0800, Robin Cover wrote: >See Naveh and others on proto-Canaanite writing - "vertical >boustrophedon" is a common locution. Vertical alphabetic >apparently dropped out of use by about 1100 BCE. To clarify, is Naveh talking about vertical text -- i.e. glyphs stacked one o

Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?

2000-12-21 Thread Robin Cover
See Naveh and others on proto-Canaanite writing - "vertical boustrophedon" is a common locution. Vertical alphabetic apparently dropped out of use by about 1100 BCE. - Robin Cover --- On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Michael Everson wrote: > Ar 13:0

Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?

2000-12-21 Thread Michael Everson
Ar 13:02 -0800 2000-12-20, scríobh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >I have never heard of >boustrophedon used for vertical text. Neither have I. ME

Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?

2000-12-20 Thread John Jenkins
On Wednesday, December 20, 2000, at 01:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 12/20/2000 02:26:24 PM Elaine Keown wrote: > > >> Literally 'boustrophedon' refers to how an ox plows a field. > > And I think that has always been understood in the context of writing to > mean with successive lines

RE: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?

2000-12-20 Thread Peck, Jon
Baile Átha Cliath 2; Éire/Ireland Guthán: +353 1 478-2597 ** Facsa: +353 1 478-2597 (by arrangement) 27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn; Baile an Bhóthair; Co. Átha Cliath; Éire -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 3:03 PM To: Unicode

Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?

2000-12-20 Thread Peter_Constable
On 12/20/2000 02:26:24 PM Elaine Keown wrote: >Literally 'boustrophedon' refers to how an ox plows a field. And I think that has always been understood in the context of writing to mean with successive lines running in alternate directions (regardless of the direction in which lines follow one

Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?

2000-12-20 Thread Rick McGowan
Elain wrote: > Chinese and Japanese newspapers are still mostly written in a vertical, > frequently right-to-left, boustrophedon. No, not exactly. They don't go "as the ox plows", and it is entirely improper to utilize the term "boustrophedon" to refer to them. They are written in columns,

boustrophedon more current, not ancient?

2000-12-20 Thread Elaine Keown
Hello, I studied Chinese in "horizontal, left to right mode" in Boston, but my impression is that Chinese and Japanese newspapers are still mostly written in a vertical, frequently right-to-left, boustrophedon. I know nothing whatsoever about Korean. But, of course, I am not using the word