Peter Constable quoted Peter R.
Mueller-Roemer:
>> SIL-fonts and TITUS have been called legacy or not up to date in our
>> forum
>
> What about the SIL and TITUS fonts is legacy?
There was a confused discussion last week over SIL Ezra and Ezra SIL,
and the fact that the older one used PUA code p
On 03/12/2004 09:40, Peter R. Mueller-Roemer wrote:
...
With bwhebb.ttf I had success!
But I don't think this is "open" in the sense you mean. It is, I think,
a part of the commercial package BibleWorks, and not in the public
domain. It is also a legacy font which uses Unicode Latin-1 code point
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
> Of Peter R. Mueller-Roemer
> Sorry! I double-clicked on its icon - whith a
> colored "OT" - in \WINDOWS\Fonts again it says after version 1.xx
> "(Opent Type)". I took that to mean Open Source or something more open
> than MS's restri
> Arial Unicode MS version 1.01 is most current and shipped with Office
> 2003. I called it OpenFont. Sorry! I double-clicked on its icon -
> whith a colored "OT" - in \WINDOWS\Fonts again it says after version
> 1.xx "(Opent Type)". I took that to mean Open Source or something
> more open than MS'
Thanks for the many replies. I learned that
Arial Unicode MS version 1.01 is most current and shipped with Office 2003.
I called it OpenFont. Sorry! I double-clicked on its icon - whith a
colored "OT" - in \WINDOWS\Fonts again it says after version 1.xx
"(Opent Type)". I took that to mean Open So
5 matches
Mail list logo
