Re: list etiquette (was Re: Tailoring of normalization

2003-02-06 Thread Tex Texin
Guys, fair enough. I thought the semi-serious name would have been indication enough for someone to hit the delete key and remove the name, but I guess not. I'll probably hear from a Mr. Max Delete from the Exchange next wanting to know why I instigated this. Reminds me of the story of the suppor

Re: list etiquette (was Re: Tailoring of normalization

2003-02-06 Thread Curtis Clark
Lars Marius Garshol wrote: * Tex Texin | | There probably isn't a one-size fits all solution, short of those | not wanting a response changing their reply-to address to | "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". That's dangerous. Quite a few email clients will then create replies that go only to that address, so no

Re: list etiquette (was Re: Tailoring of normalization

2003-02-06 Thread Lars Marius Garshol
* Tex Texin | | There probably isn't a one-size fits all solution, short of those | not wanting a response changing their reply-to address to | "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". That's dangerous. Quite a few email clients will then create replies that go only to that address, so nobody will see them at all..

Re: list etiquette (was Re: Tailoring of normalization

2003-02-05 Thread Tex Texin
I don't know about others, but my filters place messages in different folders, EXCEPT when my name is on the cc or to list. In that case, the message is left in my inbox for more immediate review and possible response. The Unicode lists are also slow to send mail so there can be a significant dela

Re: list etiquette (was Re: Tailoring of normalization

2003-02-05 Thread Lars Marius Garshol
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Please forgive me and others who are on similar set-ups if this is | all just too much of a pain! It is hard for people to avoid giving others two copies of replies to on-list messages. In my case I've solved this, since my email client (Gnus) detects duplicate messages (

Re: list etiquette (was Re: Tailoring of normalization

2003-02-04 Thread jameskass
. Peter Constable wrote, > I wish everyone made a habit of not cc'ing those already on the list -- I > likewise don't like receiving personally-addressed copies of messages sent > to the list. Here's how it works on AT&T Net Mail: I click on reply to your message, I get a compose message screen

list etiquette (was Re: Tailoring of normalization

2003-02-04 Thread Peter_Constable
On 02/04/2003 10:58:54 AM Rick McGowan wrote: >(Number one: Please don't CC me on this discusion. I'm on the list and I >don't need 2 copies of every mail.) I wish everyone made a habit of not cc'ing those already on the list -- I likewise don't like receiving personally-addressed copies of mess