.
There you will find more statistics.
A./
Best regards
JSB
available
somewhere?
The announcement gives a link to click through.
There you will find more statistics.
I guess you mean Character Assignment Overview at
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.0.0/
However it does not provide the precise answer to my primary question,
which is not purely
of character statistics by Unicode
version (from 1.0.0 to 6.0) at:
http://babelstone.blogspot.com/2005/11/how-many-unicode-characters-are-there.html
Andrew
FW to Unicode ml
From: ernestvandenbooga...@hotmail.com
To: jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl
Subject: RE: statistics
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:13:17 +0200
In 5.2, Chapter 2.4 table 2-3 is listed which General Categories are
characters. Out are: Surrogates, Private Use, Non-characters and Reserved
Ernest van den Boogaard wrote:
In 5.2, Chapter 2.4 table 2-3 is listed which General Categories are
characters. Out are: Surrogates, Private Use, Non-characters and
Reserved code points. Note that Format characters (Cf) are included as
characters. The code points with formatting aspects in C0
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 announceme...@unicode.org wrote:
The newly finalized Unicode Version 6.0 adds 2,088 characters,
What is the current total? Are other statistic informations available
somewhere?
Best regards
JSB
--
,
dr hab. Janusz S. Bien, prof. UW -
I seem to remember that someone recently posted a link to some
statistics on character set usage, but I can't seem to find it in my
old messages. Can anyone help?
John.
--
-- Over 1500 webcams from ski resorts around the world - http://www.snoweye.com/
-- Translate your technical documents
So does my Rurouni Kensin album go under R or under ru?
Maybe ru is better because few words start with ru.
$B!z$8$e$&$$$C$A$c$s!z(B
"AIS TSXQ QDOO TD AISC TDQMIG, HYCTDL,
ZIC HIIUPLB XSHM GDOPHPISX CYTDL."
"QMD XDHCDQ, AIS XDD,
PX QMDCD'X LI CDHPWD.
P VSXQ WSQ RMYQ P MYED KA TA YCT PL."
The problem with your glyph statistics is that they
are based on mould counts employed by the Monotype hot metal
typesetters.
The Monotype system was capable of extensive
kerning, and therefore many glyphs were constructed from the elements provided
by the moulds at the time of composition
Hi.
Well, it can be said to be above the minimum :-) depending on
how you look at things. If you're a developer of embedded
device with a
really stringent requirement in memory footprint (for font
and others),
you may just go with 1:1 ratios for all three groups of Jamos
Mike Meir wrote:
The problem with your glyph statistics is that they are based
on mould counts employed by the Monotype hot metal typesetters.
I agree: no one will ever come up with *the* correct count.
Such general evaluations simply depend on too many things to be useful.
E.g.: which
Jungshik Shin wrote:
I think I know how you counted (initial consonants:
two for syllables with and without final consonants, three for three
kinds of vowel position/shape, vowels: two for syll.
with/without final consonants) and think you got it right.
You caught me with hands in jam:
wrote:
The problem with your glyph statistics is that they are based
on mould counts employed by the Monotype hot metal typesetters.
I agree: no one will ever come up with *the* correct count.
Such general evaluations simply depend on too many things to be useful.
E.g.: which language(s
At 5:35 PM +0200 5/31/01, Marco Cimarosti wrote:
Jungshik Shin wrote:
I think I know how you counted (initial consonants:
two for syllables with and without final consonants, three for three
kinds of vowel position/shape, vowels: two for syll.
with/without final consonants) and think
At 5:12 PM +0200 5/31/01, Marco Cimarosti wrote:
Hi.
Well, it can be said to be above the minimum :-) depending on
how you look at things. If you're a developer of embedded
device with a
really stringent requirement in memory footprint (for font
and others),
you may just go with
of Congress, 101 Independence Ave. SE, Washington, D.C. 20540-9334 U.S.A.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 93 14:12:07 -0400
From: jage (James E. Agenbroad)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: jage@seq1
Subject: Some Character to Glyph Statistics
You may be interested by Creating and supporting OpenType fonts for Indic
scripts and Creating and supporting OpenType fonts for Arabic scripts, both
available at http://www.microsoft.com/typography/tt/tt.htm.
To give a little bit of context, the OpenType architecture separates shaping in
two
: Fri, 10 Sep 93 14:12:07 -0400
From: jage (James E. Agenbroad)
Subject: Some Character to Glyph Statistics
Recent Internet discussions about fonts for ISO10646/Unicode prompted
me to do some counting. The data are suggestive rather than definitive
at least in part because the counts
BTW, if anyone was wondering where I came up with the
figure 880,325 reserved unassigned code points for Unicode
3.1, here are the complete statistics for Unicode 3.0 and
Unicode 3.1:
Unicode: U 3.0 U 3.1
BMP Alphas/Symbols 10236 10238
Suppl Alphas/Symbols
19 matches
Mail list logo
