Marco Cimarosti wrote:
Actually, C does have different types for characters within strings and for
characters in isolation.
That is not my point of view.
There is a special case for 'H', that holds int type rather than char, for
backward compatibility reasons (such as because the first
Antoine Leca wrote:
Marco Cimarosti wrote:
Actually, C does have different types for characters within
strings and for
characters in isolation.
That is not my point of view.
There is a special case for 'H', that holds int type rather
than char, for
backward compatibility reasons (such
From: "Marco Cimarosti" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the Surrograte (aka "Astral") Planes.
I believe the UTC has deprecated the term Astral planes with extreme
prejudice. HTH!
michka
a new book on internationalization in VB at
http://www.i18nWithVB.com/
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 06:54:27AM -0800, Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:
From: "Marco Cimarosti" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the Surrograte (aka "Astral") Planes.
I believe the UTC has deprecated the term Astral planes with extreme
prejudice. HTH!
The UTC has chosen not use the term Astral Plane.
ot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode]
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 06:54:27AM -0800, Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:
From: "Marco Cimarosti" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the Surrograte (aka "Astral") Plan
David Starner wrote:
I chose Astral Planes for perceived grace
and beauty.
Thank you!
--
There is / one art || John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no more / no less|| http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things ||
David Starner wrote:
Sent: 20 Nov 2000, Mon 16.18
To: Unicode List
Subject: Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode]
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 06:54:27AM -0800, Michael (michka)
Kaplan wrote:
From: "Marco Cimarosti" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the Surrograte (aka "Astral&
Hi Jani,
I dunno. I oversimplified in that statement about exposing vs. hiding.
ICU "hides" the facts about the Unicode implementation in macros,
specifically a next and previous character macro and various other
fillips. If you look very closely at the function (method) prototypes you
can see
ormation.
Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Michael (michka) Kaplan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Unicode List" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 06:54
Subject: Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode]
From: "Marco Cimarosti" [EMAIL PROTEC
Addison P. Phillips wrote:
I ended up deciding that the Unicode API for this OS will only work in
strings. CTYPE replacement functions (such as isalpha) and
character based
replacement functions (such as strchr) will take and return
strings for
all of their arguments.
Internally, my
Ooops!
In my previous message, I wrote:
wchar_t * _wcschr_32(const wint_t * s, wchar_t c);
wchar_t * _wcsrchr_32(const wint_t * s, wchar_t c);
What I actually wanted to write is:
wchar_t * _wcschr_32(const wchar_t * s, wint_t c);
wchar_t * _wcsrchr_32(const wchar_t * s, wint_t c);
Sorry if
for example.
Mark
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Unicode List" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 13:24
Subject: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode]
Normally this thread would be of only academic interest to me...
...bu
Well... I think you're right. I knew that char and string units weren't
really the same thing. My concern was how to make it easy on developers to
use the Unicode API using their "native intelligence".
More thought makes me less certain of my approach. Specifically, as Mark
points out, looping
Normally this thread would be of only academic interest to me...
...but this week I'm writing a spec for adding Unicode support to an
embedded operating system written in C. Due to Mssrs. O'Conner and
Scherer's presentations at the most recent IUC, I was aware of the clash
between internal
: Thursday, November 16, 2000 13:24
Subject: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode]
Normally this thread would be of only academic interest to me...
...but this week I'm writing a spec for adding Unicode support to an
embedded operating system written in C. Due to Mssrs. O'Conner and
15 matches
Mail list logo
