Kosta Tachtevrenidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the first steps have been taken. If you go to my website
> (www.tachtevrenidis.com) and scroll all the way down, you will find an
> ebuild I did for unicon last summer. Maybe you could improve it or
> simply get ideas off it.
Thanks!
--
[EMAIL
Barry,
the first steps have been taken. If you go to my website
(www.tachtevrenidis.com) and scroll all the way down, you will find an
ebuild I did for unicon last summer. Maybe you could improve it or
simply get ideas off it.
to infinity,
Kosta Tachtevrenidis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm writi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the most effective way to approach this is "What is the
problem? How can we solve it?" and then make it work with .NET, but
so it is not tied to .NET. If the purpose is merely to provide a
complete wrapper around .NET, then I don't think it is worth the
trouble.
W
Shamim Mohamed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/19/2005, "Clint Jeffery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> admits:
> > [I don't] like Microsoft (I used to)...
> > I enjoy Microsoft bashing as a form of light entertainment rather than
> > negative
> > energy...
>
> Ha! You can take a boy out of Seattle, but yo
Federico Balbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jut a note... thanks M$ I have a job...
I would say instead that thanks to M$ your job makes you work on M$.
People wouldn't have eschewed computers had Bill Gates never been
born. Maybe they would have used them yet more.
If we are to remain creative
On 1/19/2005, "Clint Jeffery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> admits:
> [I don't] like Microsoft (I used to)...
> I enjoy Microsoft bashing as a form of light entertainment rather than
> negative
> energy...
Ha! You can take a boy out of Seattle, but you can't the Seattle out of
a boy. Clint shows himself t
Nevin :-] Liber wrote:
> What really saddens me is the sheer amount of negative energy this
> community espouses towards Microsoft.
Well, I think it's safe to say that Microsoft has earned this negative
energy through their predatory business practices and the sheer
crappiness of so much of their
Steve Wampler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nevin :-] Liber wrote:
> >What really saddens me is the sheer amount of negative energy this
> >community espouses towards Microsoft. This certainly isn't the Icon
> >community of my youth. It used to be a place that encouraged, not
> >discouraged, as
Jut a note... thanks M$ I have a job... if I go around just supporting
Linux I would probably be unemployed. Hate or not the point is that MS is
the most used platform so Unicon for Windows is only good for Unicon.
It's funny though too see how many Linux supporters slash M$ haters send
their comp
Nevin :-] Liber wrote:
Yet Icon itself was "Free as in Free" (aka public domain), which
Stallman also disdains.
Hi Nevin,
Stallman isn't a god. He has a specific agenda, which I happen to
agree with *in part*. I like public domain, though the threat of
abuse (e.g. splintering Icon into incompati
[Nevin writes:]
> What really saddens me is the sheer amount of negative energy this
> community espouses towards Microsoft. This certainly isn't the Icon
> community of my youth. It used to be a place that encouraged, not
> discouraged, as many platforms as possible. Not anymore.
Heh heh,
At 10:11 PM -0700 12/27/04, Gene Arthur wrote:
Watching the dotnet discussion, just wondering does anyone have any stats on
how many Unicon users are using the M$ platform as opposed to open source
OS's (linux,freebsd,netbsd,etc).
If you want the language to survive, the stat you really want to
co
12 matches
Mail list logo
