-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Never attribute to malice that which can adequately be explained by poor
programming ability. ;)
But this just goes to show why the software for electronic voting machines
needs to be Open Source (i.e. available for all to read and inspect).
Here's one citing the same company which makes the machines we use in
Philadelphia:
http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,65609,00.html?tw=rss.TOP
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: University City List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004
On 06 Nov, 2004, at 17:50, Stephen Fisher wrote:
what seems very odd to me is why they called it officer's control
button. why not press here to prepare machine for next voter?
It's like the creation of a textbook...
The machine is a synthesis of the requirements from Election
Commissions
On 06 Nov, 2004, at 07:27, Marianne Das wrote:
You might ask if they still provide election workers with a video. I
found
this more helpful than the training session or the book along.
I don't know that they provide one to each attendee any more -- they
didn't offer me one, I just got the
On 07 Nov, 2004, at 09:15, Bill Sanderson wrote:
Here's one citing the same company which makes the machines we use in
Philadelphia:
http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,65609,00.html?tw=rss.TOP
Where was the story the other day about how those same machines in
Philadelphia started out with
William H. Magill wrote:
L a s e r B e a m ® wrote:
why are we being asked to 'talk to each other' in terms of religious
values? when we live in a secular democracy?
This is actually the heart of the matter. And it is why the right
cannot dialog with the left.
fixed that for ya, bill®!
the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What the Democrats need to do is to get this message into the
heartland.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] com wrote:
With all due respect...
Those with the vision of the anointed seem to think that if people
disagree with them, they simply didn't get the message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This, from today's DP. How do the red and blue blocks of University City
respond to this?
I don't think the red and blue blocks of u city have
anything to add here, al®. ucd's marketing director,
LoriKleinBrennan®, already had the vision back in july 2004:
Maybe
not safe for work or children or sensitive adults, even if it is the
president:
http://img14.exs.cx/img14/3961/GeorgeWBushFinger.gif
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
http://www.purple.com/list.html.
This is quite funny. Ok, I'll bite. What non-partisan political analysts
would those be?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of William H. Magill
BTW, while neither has released the actual numbers, quite a number of
In a message dated 11/6/2004 8:16:23 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You
might ask if they still provide election workers with a video. I foundthis
more helpful than the training session or the book
along.
The "video" is also shown on a few cable stations, and all
Where was the story the other day about how those same machines in
Philadelphia started out with pre-recorded votes for Kerry?
I heard that this was a error in the part of the Republican
inspectors. They thought the machines had pre-recorded votes when in
fact it was just the starting count
12 matches
Mail list logo
