Maybe I'm confused about this, but aren't local property owners responsible
for the condition of their sidewalks? Not the City? In other words, I don't
think the City can decide to repave sidewalks, except on property it owns,
such as City Hall, parks, bridges, etc. Perhaps the stretch of
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN writes:
I think what sharreiff was getting at, above, is that there
are ways for an organization to behave responsibly,
publicly, as an organization, and when it doesn't, the
person in charge is most responsible, ultimately responsible.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, Ray,
Bill Sanderson wrote:
How many people here--including Al Krigman--would expect an employer to
publicly discuss an issue with an employee that might have serious
consequences for both?
Sure--the employee has been asked not to comment publicly. Sure, the
consequences should he do so are likely
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN wrote:
haha you really haven't the foggiest idea what we've been talking
about, do you?
Anthony West wrote:
Other than the paranoid part, no, I don't, Ray.
I see no evidence posted on this thread, or any other you've chimed
in on lately, that anyone else understands what
Wait a minute, Ray, I asked you what you would have done - not what you think
UCD did wrong. So, in the situation where a valuable employee is accused in
the newspaper of having done something improper, for starters, you'd put
press releases on your organization's web site?
Not sure how
Ross Bender wrote:
While I enjoy the surrealistic air, paranoid ambiance, and Rashomon-like
fog
of this UC Village listserve, Tony West is as far as I know the only
professional journalist contributing to this list.
That's why I was gratified to see his immediate summary of the events at
the
Sharrieff, your long reply from last night (copied below) seems to say it
wasn't new information, I'm just guessing. Is that what it says? Have you
made your allegations against Lewis Wendell and asked him to resign on the
basis of just guessing?
If not, from what sources did you obtain
Oh yes, I agree that the owner is primarily responsible for the sidewalks.? I
don't think that bars the city from doing it, as they seem to from time to time
to improve an area.? I'm just saying new sidewalks would be much better for
most of us on the milled streets than new streets.
Paul
Friends and Neighbors:
This morning while taking my children to the park, I found a tricycle
under a tree on the 4700 block of Hazel, on the north side, close to
48th street.
It strikes me that it was probably taken out of someone's side yard or
off of a porch; it's too nice a bike to have
Bill Sanderson wrote:
How many people here--including Al Krigman--would expect an employer to
publicly discuss an issue with an employee that might have serious
consequences for both?
Not just including me. Perhaps especially me. The employee-employer issue
certainly is a private matter unless
No.
S
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 12:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; univcity@list.purple.com
Subject: Re: New information [was: Re: [UC] Press release or Wendell
Im not the one guessing around. It only seems like new information
to you because you havent been paying attention.
and BTW, it is not my responsibility to tell anyone anything.
S
-Original Message-
From: S. Sharrieff Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007
12 matches
Mail list logo
