I remember that!! I think I called attention to the incident on the list after
seeing it on Andrew's Malcolm X. Park blog and the Daily News. (Andrew later
apologized for causing trouble.) Kyle may not have thought it was important
enough to discuss but Fenton was eventually fired over it, so I
Maybe but I have said this a few times in the past—when UCNeighbors was first
started, in fact—and it has not happened yet.
F
On Apr 2, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Brian Siano wrote:
> Frank, I'll make you a bet: that in the very near future, people on this list
> will take your "I think he did it to a
Frank Carroll wrote:
If I remember correctly—and I'm sure that I do—Kyle
started his "personal" listserv less than a week before
his book was released. I always suspected that he did it
to avoid any discussion about the book's subject matter.
In that sense I agree with you. I don't think he can
e
Frank, I'll make you a bet: that in the very near future, people on this
list will take your "I think he did it to avoid discussion of his book"
speculation, and treat it as a given fact.
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Frank Carroll wrote:
> If I remember correctly—and I'm sure that I do—Kyle
If I remember correctly—and I'm sure that I do—Kyle started his "personal"
listserv less than a week before his book was released. I always suspected that
he did it to avoid any discussion about the book's subject matter. In that
sense I agree with you. I don't think he can easily deal with disa
Sure, Kimm. Snide is good enough.
He didn't "put the community through turmoil" that I could see. The
community (specifically the community around 40th & Pine, not your
community or mine) was faced with a stark choice between Tom Lussenhop's
mediocre highrise hotel and your ugly, crumbling der
Tony,
Wow you think what I said was nasty? Snide, maybe, but in that case I¹d
better stay over here. Given the turmoil he put this community through, I
think it was pretty mild. There¹s a difference between ³conflict and
confrontation² and ³nastiness and incivility.² But those distinctions g
This is as disgusting a piece of revisionist history as I've ever seen.
Kyle's style may be "freewheeling," but it certainly never reached anything
like the insults and angry invective that many others have used on _this_
list. As I recall it, Kyle attempted to reply to Glenn's points calmly and
ra
Wilma de Soto wrote:
As an original member of the SHCA Listserv and its subsequent UnivCity
Listserv, I will never believe UCNeighbors was not formed in order to
discredit and shut down the UnivCity Listserv@ purple.
kyle set up his listserv towards the end of july 2007 after
being on this l
Dear Tony,
Did you write to me in order to inform me that you belong to many listservs
as do I, or try to convince me that UCNeighbors REALLY wanted me to join
when I was told otherwise after I called them out when they originally
formed the other listserv.
Perhaps you are trying to convince me a
Title: Re: [UC] Drug pushers in the NYTimes
Wilma,I agree with Tony. I belong to both listservs (univcity and UCNeighbors), but find univcity less and less useful or civil. UCNeighbors is more active and I find the dialog more engaging and community-oriented.Please come join us.Margie Apr 1, 2010
Wilma,
Since a lot of people, like myself, subscribe to both lists (actually
I'm on four neighborhood lists), there's no "they" vs. "we". There are
just two different products out there, for any of us to patronize as we
choose.
Some people don't want to subscribe to multiple listserves for t
12 matches
Mail list logo
