Kimm Tynan wrote:
Melani,
If a small, vocal group of our UC neighbors continues to reject the
restrictions which a local HD would impose, then, because of the increasing
popularity of our neighborhood, we are probably beginning an era of tear-downs
and requests for changes in height.
This is
That is the $64 question, isn't it?
There are similarities but also differences. A lot of folks will be
taking a close look at this one, won't they?
-- Tony West
Kimm Tynan wrote:
It seemed pretty apparent to me that Karen was making the point that
the supporters of the hotel opened the do
Melani,
> Guy, you ask a good question here, but I don't see why you attribute it to
> Karen. Her disparaging email to me, cc'd to the list, didn't comment on
> precedent; it was personal.
It seemed pretty apparent to me that Karen was making the point that the
supporters of the hotel opened th
mlam...@aol.com wrote:
/*your argument for supporting historic districts is misplaced
here. in fact, your arguing for a 10-story hotel at 40th and
pine is AGAINST everything that historic districts are
designed to protect (streetscapes, fabric, ensembles, etc.)*/
A new 10-story hotel would be out
mlam...@aol.com wrote:
Alas, the proposed inn's location at 40th & Pine is not in a local
historic district! If it were, then the developers would not be able to
tear it down, AND they would not be able to build a tall building, and
perhaps more UC neighbors would be satisfied!
the reason t
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:57 AM, wrote:
> In answer to your question, first I'll repeat that I would like to see the
> Italianate building on Pine Street saved and restored. That's my
> motivation; it is not exactly that I can't wait to see a 10-story building
> next door - but I don't oppose i
