Maybe they could extract a little professional courtesy from Villanova
and have us both excommunicated, Craig.
-- Tony West
Nor did I suggest Penn can simultaneous force housing prices up and
down. With such powers, they could be much more advantageously applied
to quietly making list trouble
In a message dated 8/20/2007 12:49:24 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No matter how diabolical you believe a university's powers are, it can't
simultaneously force housing prices up, to further its Macchiavellian scheme
of
gentrification, and force housing prices do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I needed a good chuckle this morning... and got it from this article and
totally absurd statements like:
1. "prices, per bed, from $975 to $1,250, which is slightly higher than
the estimated averages provided by the university's Off-Campus Living Office"
2. "
In a message dated 8/20/2007 12:00:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Penn, however, criticized the decision, saying in a statement Monday that
administrators "were surprised and profoundly disappointed by the verdict and
will appeal."
University spokeswoman Lori Doy
That point looks sound, Frank. Most residents around here are renters,
however. Any one action by Penn (or anybody else) may either push rents
up, or push rents down, but not, in the end, both at once. As I said,
pick your poison.
-- Tony West
Frank wrote:
I don't see how rents down/taxes up
I don't see how rents down/taxes up is a contradiction. I'm not a
real estate expert but, it seems to me, as total costs of ownership
goes up, purchase prices should come down, unless buyers want to pay
more for houses that will have higher taxes.
Frankus
Sleek. Edgy. Infinitely flexible.
Here's another case where we can have either disaster we want, but not
contradictory disasters at the same time.
A softening of rents might do all you say to small landlords. But it
will benefit small renters in the short run; and the short run is what
matters to most University Citizens today
In a message dated 8/19/2007 10:55:23 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm inclined to give Gutmann two out of four falls.
Shaking my head side-to-side, not wanting to be offensive on the UC Civility
List
#3. In the strictest sense, the Radian should cause a boomlet at
Al,
I'm inclined to give Gutmann two out of four falls.
#3. In the strictest sense, the Radian should cause a boomlet at least,
if its upshot is a net increase of hundreds of new residents. That'll be
especially true if University City winds up with a net increase of
hundreds of residents who
>
> Indeed. Arghhh! (to put it nicely)
>
> -linda
>
>
>
> Al wrote:
>
> (I needed a good chuckle this morning... and got it from this article and
> totally absurd statements like:
> 1. "prices, per bed, from $975 to $1,250, which is slightly higher than the
> estimated averages provided by
(I needed a good chuckle this morning... and got it from this article and
totally absurd statements like:
1. "prices, per bed, from $975 to $1,250, which is slightly higher than
the estimated averages provided by the university's Off-Campus Living Office"
2. " '[The Radian] will be an e
11 matches
Mail list logo
