Re: [UC] Re: [Ucneighbors] added details on the 400 S. 40th proposal

2007-11-14 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
Anthony West wrote: Enough of who won nothing. The real news is these are, on the whole, tentative responses to a project that is still evolving in response to its responses. An anxiety that recurred throughout the SHCA meeting was that people want to know exactly how far along in the

Re: [UC] Re: [Ucneighbors] added details on the 400 S. 40th proposal

2007-11-14 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 11/14/2007 12:00:27 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: does anybody have any ideas for what to do at halftime? besides marching in formation? or locker-room deals? For starters, go to the on-line petition and register your qualms about the project.

Re: [UC] Re: [Ucneighbors] added details on the 400 S. 40th proposal

2007-11-14 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: does anybody have any ideas for what to do at halftime? besides marching in formation? or locker-room deals? For starters, go to the on-line petition and register your qualms about the project. Click here

[UC] Re: [Ucneighbors] added details on the 400 S. 40th proposal

2007-11-13 Thread MLamond
In a message dated 11/13/07 11:38:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Two different measures suggested that those who were decidedly opposed to the project slightly outnumbered those who were in favor, but that undecideds and neutrals were numerous, and many people expressed complex, ambivalent

[UC] Re: [Ucneighbors] added details on the 400 S. 40th proposal

2007-11-13 Thread Anthony West
Speaking as someone who has taken responsibility to run genuine association elections, fake elections hold little weight with me. They are public-opinion toys, nothing more. My reckoning of that inconsequential moment was that a few more hands were raised for 'opposed' than were raised for