Re: [UC] Renter-owner conflicts (Was: Re: SCHA Zoning meeting DVD)

2008-02-22 Thread Glenn
to the people! Power to West Philadelphia! Glenn - Original Message - From: UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: UnivCity listserv UnivCity@list.purple.com Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:37 PM Subject: Re: [UC] Renter-owner conflicts (Was: Re: SCHA Zoning meeting DVD

Re: [UC] Renter-owner conflicts (Was: Re: SCHA Zoning meeting DVD)

2008-02-22 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 2/21/2008 10:43:20 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: it turns out anyone can have a stake, and everyone feels their stake is just as important as the next guy's. This issue of standing is important in zoning matters, of course. In this case, I

Re: [UC] Renter-owner conflicts (Was: Re: SCHA Zoning meeting DVD)

2008-02-22 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This issue of standing is important in zoning matters, of course. In this case, I believe that an extended geographical radius is appropriate because Penn's history shows that a precedent may be set if the variance in question were allowed, which affects a broad area

[UC] Renter-owner conflicts (Was: Re: SCHA Zoning meeting DVD)

2008-02-21 Thread Anthony West
Kimm, I understand everything you say, and not a word rings false to my ear. Social tensions between renters and owners are an intractable social problem that is very particular to University City -- for reasons of simple mathematical fact. I have always lived on a block on which renters

Re: [UC] Renter-owner conflicts (Was: Re: SCHA Zoning meeting DVD)

2008-02-21 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
Anthony West wrote: On the other hand, I have to say renters have the same obligation to read and to learn that owners do. If legal distinctions are made between renters and owners, both sides should be aware of them. I hope there are both renters and owners who are curious about the facts of