In a message dated 6/26/07 12:07:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But here we are. We must take the UCD for what is is. We may never
truly come together under a generalissimo UCD director, but that's hardly a
problem. If UCD stayed as it is now getting funded by local businesses and
Melani,
Why does the UCD, its staff and steering committee, want to have two
separate legal entities? What would the scope of control be in such a
scenario? I'm assuming both non-profit orgs would each have their own
separate funds. Would the local landowners paying into the BID/NID no
In a message dated 6/26/07 2:07:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Melani,
Why does the UCD, its staff and steering committee, want to have two
separate legal entities? What would the scope of control be in such a
scenario?
I'm assuming both non-profit orgs would each have their own
Melani,
Thanks for the information. I guess there are a good deal of competing
interests. all the more reason for getting people to tell the greater
community what specifically they want out of both the UCD and NID/BID
organization. I'll also have to look into the laws governing the
Why don't these people ever speak for themselves?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] UCD - clarifying the UCD/BID relationship
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:43:25 EDT
But what's happening now, in this outcry of anger at the UCD, must be
making
the people who pay for the UCD itself pause
