Re: Fwd: [UC] Explaining Sub prime lending : Kudos to my colleagues, competition, local Lenders and PENN

2007-05-10 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I disagree that we have dodged the fallout from subprime lending tactics by lenders. I agree. I think everyone ends up getting bumped -- by the same dominos we said were moving our collective lots along when things were falling the other way, right?

Re: Fwd: [UC] Explaining Sub prime lending : Kudos to my colleagues, competition, local Lenders and PENN

2007-05-10 Thread Ross Bender
On 5/9/07, Elizabeth F Campion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Behaviors improve as people acquire things (like homes) that they fear to lose. Home ownership is a good thing, even in 'flat' markets. Being house proud, having privacy and control, being able to personalize one's space, roots and

Fwd: [UC] Explaining Sub prime lending : Kudos to my colleagues, competition, local Lenders and PENN

2007-05-09 Thread pmuyehara
I disagree that we have dodged the fallout from subprime lending tactics by lenders. The city has been going through a massive increase in foreclosures, much of it resulting from predatory lending. The mortgage market is no longer local and mortgages have become commodities traded on Wall

Re: Fwd: [UC] Explaining Sub prime lending : Kudos to my colleagues, competition, local Lenders and PENN

2007-05-09 Thread Elizabeth F Campion
Paul, you are correct. I wrote with too much passion and haste. I intended to say we are not seeing problems in the magnitude visible in the Bush strongholds of Texas and Florida. I am sincere, in feeling grateful for the people and institutions who have kept some checks and balances in place,