[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/
//*In a message dated 6/11/07 12:03:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:*
/
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/9/07 1:44:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ucd also:
markets us,
brands us,
kicks businesses out and installs others,
programs our entertainments,
In a message dated 6/11/07 12:03:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 6/9/07 1:44:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> ucd also:
> markets us,
> brands us,
> kicks businesses out and installs others,
> programs our entertainments,
> occupies our publi
Ross Bender wrote:
Ray, those are some truly earthshatteringly lousy lyrics.
I admit I'm no songwriter or chant-meister. that's why I
share with you folks. feel free to re-write!
..
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
[aka laserbeam®]
[aka ray]
SERIAL LIAR. CALL FOR RATES.
"It is very
On 6/11/07, UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
C F Em Dm | CF Em Dm
U C D! GET OUT ON THE STREET
C F Em Dm | CF EmDm
U C D! WE NEED A CLEAN SWEEP
G C
GET OUT OF OUR STORES AND OUR PARKS
G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ray, I'd really appreciate it if you can give us an example of all or some of
the above, with an explanation of how each has affected the neighborhood.
hi melani. excellent question -- and you know what? I think
it would be much more useful and illuminating if your
09, 2007 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [UC] Funding special services (Was: which bad thing?)
In a message dated 6/9/07 1:44:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> writes:
ucd also:
markets us,
brands us,
kicks businesses out and installs others,
pro
In a message dated 6/9/07 1:44:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> ucd also:
>
> markets us,
>
> brands us,
>
> kicks businesses out and installs others,
>
> programs our entertainments,
>
> occupies our public spaces,
>
> populates our public buildings,
> puts their agendas into our nei
Anthony West wrote:
Hi, Guy. I find all this negativism annoying too,
especially when it is accompanied by a complete lack of
practical thinking.
I think your idea is great, and thinking about it with
some good business heads could be very beneficial for
University City
Remember, though, about
> Guy's line of discovery is the best way to decide either to defend or reject
> UCD. It provides the information base we all need to make an informed
> judgement on this question.
And it has provided the longest UCList discussion I've ever read while
hitting 'd' the fewest times.
Dan W.
Y
I am extremely happy. It is the only approach to evaluating UCD that can truly
answer most UC-list readers' root concern: is there a better way to run UCD
than the way UCD is now running it?
Guy's line of discovery is the best way to decide either to defend or reject
UCD. It provides the inform
On a small scale, I am happy that anyone is even considering the alternative
of creating a true "community based" organization to supplement the City's
services. It's probably a great way to unite the neighborhood (if it could
really happen).
It is a little disappointing to hear such "can'
I don't understand all the rules regarding the establishment of these type
entities, but I see it working as follows:
1) we take the structure of the NID and the Community usurps it.
meaning that we have the same "taxing authority" that the NID would have had.
Just
the community runs
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] Funding special services - PA BID law
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 16:08:24 EDT
...The main reason that the UCD BID
proposal has dragged on for so long is that Councilwoman Blackwell has
heard that
there isn't universal approval of it, so she refus
They might feel that way, but paying more money shouldn't equate into being
entitled to having more power. A person who pays more money in taxes still
can cast only one vote in the political process.
From: Brian Siano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [UC] Funding special service
Kyle Cassidy wrote:
You have to fund it somehow, and if one of the goals is to cut the big
doners out (and thereby their influence), you need to make up for some
of that lost revenue. And we already heard that going door to door with
hat in hand doesn't seem to work. If you tax everybody, then a)
In a message dated 6/8/07 3:28:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> You have to fund it somehow, and if one of the goals is to cut the big
> doners out (and thereby their influence), you need to make up for some
> of that lost revenue. And we already heard that going door to door with
> hat in han
th
as well).
-Original Message-
From: Turner,Kathleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:16 PM
To: Kyle Cassidy; Anthony West; UnivCity@list.purple.com
Subject: RE: [UC] Funding special services
So this would be an organization that has the power to impose taxe
ssidy
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:13 PM
To: Anthony West; UnivCity@list.purple.com
Subject: RE: [UC] Funding special services
I think the only practical way to do it is divide the group's budget up
among all the property owners in the area and have them (us) pay for it.
It eliminates two of th
I think the only practical way to do it is divide the group's budget up
among all the property owners in the area and have them (us) pay for it.
It eliminates two of the problems that some people had with ucd which
are:
1) uneven funding -- everybody would pay the same thing
2) representation -- t
19 matches
Mail list logo
