Glenn,
Thanks for posting what you saw/heard at this meeting.
I understand John being told not to discuss anything with anyone outside of
UCD, as there is this alleged "internal investigation". That sounds par for
the course. Not discussing with anyone at UCD I find somewhat odd. But,
whateve
nifer Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did he get fired?
Jennifer
Cedar Park
--
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *missthin
*Sent:* Thursday, June 07, 2007 2:17 PM
*To:* Glenn
*Cc:* UnivCity@list.purple.com
*Subject:* Re: [U
In a message dated 6/8/07 12:36:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Anybody notice the mention of Glenn Moyers account of the meeting. There's
> a mention of a "Glenn Bryan". Could this be Committeeman7? Under
> Glennsdesktop? He certainly could have insider information, right?
>
> Dan Myers
>
Anybody notice the mention of Glenn Moyers account of the meeting. There's a
mention of a "Glenn Bryan". Could this be Committeeman7? Under
Glennsdesktop? He certainly could have insider information, right?
Dan Myers
PS making speculations is fun, proving them is difficult! I hope not to
offend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; UnivCity@list.purple.com
Subject: Re: [UC] The Penn meeting
In a message dated 6/8/07 12:36:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anybody notice the mention of Glenn Moyers account of the meeting.
There's a mention of a "Glenn
