[Bug 507246] [NEW] failure to backup - everything is sunshine

2010-01-13 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Public bug reported: 1) $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.10 Release:9.10 2) $ dpkg -s backintime-kde | grep Version Version: 0.9.26-3 3) I expected that I see an error message when backintime fails to do a backup 4) Instead due to me bumping into the external drive, the

[Bug 507246] Re: failure to backup - everything is sunshine

2010-01-13 Thread Tomas Pospisek
** Attachment added: k1.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864469/k1.png -- failure to backup - everything is sunshine https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507246 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 507246] Re: failure to backup - everything is sunshine

2010-01-13 Thread Tomas Pospisek
forwarded upstream: #507250 -- failure to backup - everything is sunshine https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507246 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 293809] Re: chntpw fails on x86_64

2010-01-06 Thread Tomas Pospisek
It seems there is a new upstream release here: http://pogostick.net/~pnh/ntpasswd/HISTORY.txt which also fixes a 64bit bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185411 So it would only be a question of rebuilding from the new release? Debian tracks the same bug here:

[Bug 217485] Re: stack smashing detected

2009-12-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek
The bug still exists in Karmic. Debian has patch in its bugtracker. MInd you, this is also a security issue. I haven't looked into the code for a while but I remember that there were more overflows than the patch that's provided in the Debian bug report. ** Changed in: pgp4pine (Ubuntu)

[Bug 448083] Re: Tapping disabled (again) after Suspend

2009-11-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 303595 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303595 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 303595 Gsynaptics loses settings on resume -- Tapping disabled (again) after Suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448083 You received this bug

[Bug 268506] Re: Cannot configure Synaptics TouchStyk settings (e.g. sensitivity, tapping, press/select)

2009-11-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Dana Goyette has done what was wanted ** Changed in: gsynaptics (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- Cannot configure Synaptics TouchStyk settings (e.g. sensitivity, tapping, press/select) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268506 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 480156] [NEW] gsynaptics can't set horizontal scrolling

2009-11-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gsynaptics Release: Ubuntu Karmic 9.10 Package: gsynaptics Version: 0.9.16-2 This bug report is somewhat similar to bug #323053 but not identical. I can set horizontal scrolling through synclient: synclient HorizEdgeScroll=1 but setting it in

[Bug 323053] Re: gsynaptics cannot enable scroll

2009-11-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Does this still affect you in Karmic? See also bug #480156 -- gsynaptics cannot enable scroll https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323053 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 297862] Re: firebug is filling STDERR with its debug traces

2009-09-21 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Wow, first time I'm witnessing that Ubuntu's policy of self-inflicting senility (#331767) actually was able to find a bug that evaporated: Package: firebug Version: 1.3.0-1ubuntu1 Ubuntu 9.04 Firebug seems to be in a less chatty mood then originaly reported: $ firefox

[Bug 297862] Re: firebug is filling STDERR with its debug traces

2009-09-21 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Firebugs version (1.3.0-1ubuntu1) in Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty) is not as talkative as it once was. ** Changed in: firebug (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Fix Released -- firebug is filling STDERR with its debug traces https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297862 You received this bug notification

[Bug 381447] Re: kded can't find kded/networkstatus.desktop

2009-09-01 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Hello Harald, KDE maintainers and developpers, first thanks for the factual reply. On Sat, 8 Aug 2009, Harald Sitter wrote: Well, then lets take a look at it form a non-clicki-bunti POV. kded should be started independently, since it is much more verbose than applications, for a very good

[Bug 381447] Re: kded can't find kded/networkstatus.desktop

2009-07-25 Thread Tomas Pospisek
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Jonathan Thomas wrote: Is kdebsae-workspace-bin installed? Are you running in a KDE environment? (I suppose I should have grouped that with my first question) No, it's not installed and I run from the default Ubuntu desktop install, which is Gnome. I do only install

[Bug 381447] Re: kded can't find kded/networkstatus.desktop

2009-07-24 Thread Tomas Pospisek
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Jonathan Thomas wrote: Could you check to see if the file is actually there? (Should be at /usr/share/kde4/services/kded/networkstatus.desktop) It's not there: $ ls -l /usr/share/kde4/services/kded/networkstatus.desktop ls: cannot access

[Bug 385497] Re: [i965GM] PPA version 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 doesn't let me suspend

2009-07-14 Thread Tomas Pospisek
I tried today's daily (June 14th) build and was able to suspend five times, with one reboot in between. -- [i965GM] PPA version 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 doesn't let me suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385497 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 385497] Re: [i965GM] PPA version 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 doesn't let me suspend

2009-07-14 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Once again launchpad has swallowed an answer by email without a trace. Here we go again. What's wrong with launchpad? Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 01:11:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Tomas Pospisek To: Bug 385497 Cc: Bryce Harrington Subject: Re: [Bug 385497] Re: [i965GM] PPA version 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1

[Bug 381447] Re: kded can't find kded/networkstatus.desktop

2009-07-08 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Check also #324995 for a different example from the wild (second hit on Google for kded KServiceFactory::findServiceByDesktopPath). -- kded can't find kded/networkstatus.desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381447 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 381447] Re: kded can't find kded/networkstatus.desktop

2009-07-08 Thread Tomas Pospisek
as google seems to suggest, that kind of console spamming seems to be quite a common phenomenon, affecting no small number of people... -- kded can't find kded/networkstatus.desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381447 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 381447] Re: kded can't find kded/networkstatus.desktop

2009-07-08 Thread Tomas Pospisek
kded's message is also displayed very prominently in this juicy blogpost - http://marc.waeckerlin.org/computer/blog/get_rid_of_xsession- error_that_s_filling_up_the_home_directory -- kded can't find kded/networkstatus.desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381447 You received this bug

[Bug 385497] Re: [i965GM] PPA version 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 doesn't let me suspend

2009-06-29 Thread Tomas Pospisek
With the old 2.4 intel driver [1] I get both suspend and video working again. I also tried the PPA 2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 [2] package with Option AccelMethod UXA as described in [3] . Video playback worked, suspend worked too, however resume would come back with a black screen. Switching between

[Bug 385497] Re: PPA version 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 doesn't let me suspend

2009-06-16 Thread Tomas Pospisek
:38:22 +) made it onto this page. And I got no error message from launchpad either. Thus I'm trying once again, directly to launchpad: Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:43:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Tomas Pospisek To: Bug 385497 Subject: Re: [Bug 385497] Re: PPA version 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 doesn't let me

[Bug 385497] Re: PPA version 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 doesn't let me suspend

2009-06-16 Thread Tomas Pospisek
** Attachment added: kern.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27988811/kern.log -- PPA version 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 doesn't let me suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385497 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. --

[Bug 385497] Re: PPA version 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 doesn't let me suspend

2009-06-16 Thread Tomas Pospisek
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log.old http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27988818/Xorg.0.log.old -- PPA version 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 doesn't let me suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385497 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct

[Bug 385497] Re: PPA version 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 doesn't let me suspend

2009-06-16 Thread Tomas Pospisek
I'm removing the Incomplete status by setting it to New, as all relevant info's regarding the occurence of the bug should be available. If anything is missing the please ask me for it. ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- PPA version

[Bug 358365] Re: [g41] I830EmitFlush: BEGIN_BATCH called without closing ADVANCE_BATCH

2009-06-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek
However, since upgrading to the PPA release, suspend stopped working. See bug 385497 for more info. -- [g41] I830EmitFlush: BEGIN_BATCH called without closing ADVANCE_BATCH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358365 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 385497] [NEW] PPA version 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 doesn't let me suspend

2009-06-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Public bug reported: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 $ apt-cache policy xserver-xorg-video-intel xserver-xorg-video-intel: Installiert: 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 Kandidat: 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 Versions-Tabelle: *** 2:2.7.1-0ubuntu1~xup~1 0 500

[Bug 358365] Re: [g41] I830EmitFlush: BEGIN_BATCH called without closing ADVANCE_BATCH

2009-06-09 Thread Tomas Pospisek
I can confirm that the PPA drivers effectively fix the video-play-crash bug: Updated Jaunty from version to version: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics 0.99.3-2ubuntu4 - 0.99.3-2ubuntu5 xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse 1:12.5.1-4ubuntu5 - 1:12.6.4-0ubuntu1~xup~1 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.6.3-0ubuntu9 -

[Bug 381447] [NEW] kded can't find kded/networkstatus.desktop

2009-05-28 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kde4libs 1) Source package: kdelibs 2) Version of package: kdelibs-bin: Installiert: 4:4.2.2-0ubuntu5 Kandidat: 4:4.2.2-0ubuntu5 Versions-Tabelle: *** 4:4.2.2-0ubuntu5 0 500 http://ch.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100

[Bug 117200] Re: [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()

2008-04-14 Thread Tomas Pospisek
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 89962 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89962 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 89962 [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV -- [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117200 You received this

[Bug 116446] Re: [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_hash_table_insert()

2008-04-14 Thread Tomas Pospisek
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 89962 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89962 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 89962 [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV -- [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_hash_table_insert() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116446 You received

[Bug 112403] Re: [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-04-14 Thread Tomas Pospisek
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 89962 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89962 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 89962 [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV -- [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112403 You received this bug notification

[Bug 112900] Re: [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()

2008-04-14 Thread Tomas Pospisek
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 89962 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89962 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 89962 [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV -- [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112900 You received this

[Bug 89962] Re: [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-04-14 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Last I looked, Debian was at 1.9.1, while Ubuntu is still at 1.7. http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sshfs-fuse.html -- [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89962 You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is a bug assignee. --

[Bug 89962] Re: [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-04-14 Thread Tomas Pospisek
#89060, #90831, #137514, #179041, #179677, #209056 and #213055 look related -- [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89962 You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is a bug assignee. -- universe-bugs mailing list

[Bug 89962] Re: [apport] sshfs crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-04-14 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Also, #210608 seems to be related, however seems not to be readable by the world for whatever reason. From the gvfs Changelog: gvfs (0.2.3-0ubuntu2) hardy; urgency=low * debian/patches/90_from_svn_fix_unlock_crasher.patch: - change from svn to fix a potential applications crasher (lp: