boxee 64bit package depends on flashplugin-nonfree and this is why I
notice about the problem.
Why not make another package for alpha 64bit?
Also adobe package will stay in alpha for a looong time just because they not
provide full support
on this unused package (one of major distro, ubuntu, do
The main reason is no guaranteed security support from Adobe on the
alpha, if I remember correctly.
Here's a comment about the 64 bit release from Adobe:
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/000/6b3af6c9.html
On 01/13/2010 03:29 AM, Daniele Smartango wrote:
boxee 64bit package depends on
there is a ppa now:
https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/flash
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 16:12 +, Micah Gersten wrote:
The main reason is no guaranteed security support from Adobe on the
alpha, if I remember correctly.
Here's a comment about the 64 bit release from Adobe:
For me I got a problem since I installed Karmic new:
1. Installation
2.'Software Center' -- extras for Ubuntu (mp3, avi, mpge, TrueType, Java,
Flash; Codecs)
Cause of non-functional videos on some sites (???) i deinstalled
flashplugin-nonfree und manuelly installed the 10.0.32.18 version from
LAZA wrote:
For me I got a problem since I installed Karmic new:
1. Installation
2.'Software Center' -- extras for Ubuntu (mp3, avi, mpge, TrueType, Java,
Flash; Codecs)
Cause of non-functional videos on some sites (???) i deinstalled
flashplugin-nonfree und manuelly installed the
I will throw in my vote as well her:
I have been testing Kubuntu Karmic since Alpha releases. I have
installed the 64-bit version of flashplugin manually (copied into
directory) and have had no problem since.
My only complaint is that Konqueror is prompting through Update notifier
that I need to
Confirmed. I agree that if we don't want to include 64-bit Flash yet
it's better not to include it at all. Experienced user will find a way
to get it and inexperienced one *shouldn't* use this emulated 32-bit
version as it works lower than any acceptable standards. I couldn't
scroll videos from
Sorry for double post - I only wanted to point out that most users
aren't aware that it's 32-bit Flash plugin that makes their work
unstable - e.g. I initially thought that this is 64-bit version that is
so unstable and I even started to look for 32-bit one... :)
--
Please package flashplugin
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree
- well there is a x64 version of this plugin so there is no reason using
nswraper any more
- please upgrade flash version
+ The current (32-bit) flashplugin-nonfree package in x86_64 versions of
+ Ubuntu has been reported to
I'll throw in my vote. The 64-bit alpha is very stable. I upgraded to
Karmic recently and was appalled that it still used nspluginwrapper
(which consistently crashes for me).
Who cares if the 64-bit plugin is given the name of alpha, when the
state of the current nspluginwrapper configuration
One vote more to flashplugin 64 bits alpha. In the karmic alpha 5 on my
computer the nspluginwrapper crashes all the time.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Since the 32bit wrapper died multiple times a day I also installed the 64
alpha a week ago and not only does it play nicely with pulseaudio it also
crashed not once.
IMO the status of the 32bit wrapper is that bad that it can't be shipped -
rather remove flash entirely on 64 bit!
--
Please
@manzur: I'm also highly interested in it, but we must admit that the
plugin is officially __alpha__ released through adobe's lab ...
In some cases (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/35606) including mine, this
plugin hangs the browser up on many sites with illegal instruction error
message.
Is such a work can be considered for ubuntu ?
yeah in some aspects
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Another +1 for the x86_64 alpha being far, far, far more stable than the
nspluginwrapper cludge that is used currently.
Flash is used by a lot of people on a regular basis so I'm surprised to
see that the flash support in Ubuntu x86_64 is so poor.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
Micah Gersten: Indeed, but we're waiting on Adobe for an official release.
Me: If i am not wrong it is yet official released, but it is not packaged yet.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Danny, the Debian package downloads directly from Adobe, same as our old
solution.. i guess we should wait a little bit.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Here is my understanding of the issue:
We know that 64-bit Flash alplace and alpha 2 (alpha refresh) are more
stable than the 32-bit Flash, but that isn't the problem. We would make
an exception to include it in Ubuntu, but the current script can olny
download Flash from archive.canonical.com
I have tried everything, from the official latest release of flash
plugin from Adobe website , to the flashplugin-nonfree of the repository
(that it's the same version10.0.22.87).
I use Kubuntu 9.04 64bit.
Firefox installed from repo, latest version 3.0.10.
When I am seeing a flash video in
Indeed, but we're waiting on Adobe for an official release.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
It will be a while before it gets packaged since it is fairly far from
being released.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are
I'm using the 64-bit alpha version and it's working great. I have been
experiencing browser crashes once in a while, but I don't know if that's
due to the plugin (how can you tell?). However, even if it's the plugin
that causes those crashes, they are much less annoying than constantly
having to
The native 64bit should really be packaged. I installed the flashplugin-
nonfree package on my 64bit system, but it seems that connections from
flash to external pages are broken. (this happens with the games @
netlog.com if somebody would care to check :)).
I installed the native 64bit version,
problem is that we don't have a stable URL for downloading those beta
releases. also there is no official support from adobe security wise,
which is the other main blocker on installing 64-bit by default
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this
I understand the reluctance to package the alpha from Adobe Labs in
Ubuntu stable. However, I find the 64-bit plugin to be more stable than
the 32-bit plugin with nspluginwrapper and thunking.
(Those who do not want to wait for a package can download it from
This is most likely not going to happen (i dont advise it) until it is stable
release, Maye for KK we can do unstable release but not in Ubuntu stable
released (Jaunty included since we hit FF
This would be nice for a sync
** Summary changed:
- update flash plugin to the x64 version on AMD64
26 matches
Mail list logo
