Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2013-12-13 Thread dsdreamer
Triode wrote: > It needs the output device to be opened with a name of hw:* to do > this. > > However - this is only valid for usb dacs or output devices where alsa > knows the supported sample rates. For spdif then there's the > possibility that alsa believes the sample rate is supported,

Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2013-12-13 Thread dsdreamer
JackOfAll wrote: > I have views, but I need to think some more before I start airing them. > ;) The "several cans of worms in your near future" warning LED has > already started to flash. > > But immediate thought. > > Needs to be a way of specifying the exception behaviour. ie. resamp

Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2013-12-13 Thread JackOfAll
Triode wrote: > > squeezelite -r 192000,96000,48000,44100 -u E > > Where "E" = resample by exception if the output rate is not supported. > > > This would mean that it would resample 88.4k material to say 192000 but > not 96000 material. Is this the type of thing we want? > > [I am also wo

Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2013-12-13 Thread Triode
JackOfAll wrote: > Triode, > > I'm thinking out loud, and probably missing something obvious, (as per > usual), but why is any of this an issue? Squeezelite behaviour is to > open the output device at the native sample rate. If that fails then > it tries to open the device using plughw, whic

Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] piCoPlayer = Squeezelite on Microcore linux. .An embedded OS in RAM with Squeezelite

2013-12-13 Thread Fiatelis
Hi I cant test right now, but I think that I need to press CR to get a prompt when using keyboard and HDMI. Fiatelis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=60087 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevi

Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2013-12-13 Thread JackOfAll
I've accidentally deleted the email reporting the issue of the lms-CPAN package no longer compiling on x86_64. If the person who reported it is reading this, there are new packages in the testing repo (srpm and x86_64) which resolve. (And no, the fix is not a joke. Adding '-v' to the gcc CFLAGS re

Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2013-12-13 Thread JackOfAll
dsdreamer wrote: > > The only issue I have is that, when there is not a "special event," I am > forced to use the streams that use a lower audio sampling rate than > 44.1kHz. I have the following rates available on my DAC: 44100, 48000, > 88200, 96000, 176400, 192000, 352800, 384000. The result

Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2013-12-13 Thread JackOfAll
Triode wrote: > Has anyone seen the 100% cpu problem since this update? I can't > reproduce myself, but wondered how stable the latest test branch was for > people? I haven't seen it again since the update. Too soon to say if whatever you added/changed has fixed it or not, I think. I've not done

Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2013-12-13 Thread lintweaker
Triode wrote: > Has anyone seen the 100% cpu problem since this update? I can't > reproduce myself, but wondered how stable the latest test branch was for > people? I have not seen the 100% cpu problem so far. I'll give some thorough testing (I saw some XRUNs).

Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Announce: JiveLite - cut down squeezebox control application

2013-12-13 Thread mherger
Running jivelite in the HDGrid skin I'm seeing bad icons for the Radios. Is this a known issue? 15383 Looks like the applet wasn't compatible with the grid mode, but using grid size icons for the radio only or something? +---+ |Fi

Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2013-12-13 Thread bpa
dsdreamer wrote: > What is the best currently-available work-around I could use to overcome > this issue? > Have you tried setting on demand pref to WMA only - the WMA streams are 48kbps / 44.1kHz. IIRC the AAC ones were 32kHz/56kbps. ---

Re: [SlimDevices: Unix] Community Squeeze OS F19 Release 1

2013-12-13 Thread Pascal Hibon
Triode wrote: > Has anyone seen the 100% cpu problem since this update? I can't > reproduce myself, but wondered how stable the latest test branch was for > people? No, Squeezelite is behaving correctly; nor did I ever experience that issue. But I must admit that I'm doing nothing fancy; no up s