Thanks Triode. Those 70 seconds are indeed what I found as well, but I
didn't believe this would be it, as I doubt it's taking that long. I'll
add some logging around there to see what's going on. Thanks!
Michael
Am 27.05.14 19:50, schrieb Triode:
mherger wrote:
Triode,
I have a plugin wh
I don't know whether others will see this as good news, or bad.
In the interests of disclosure and before any rumours start circulating,
(a couple of other people know now), I am in discussions with a company
about them selling a product based on my, (what would otherwise have
never seen a pu
I have scoured the forums for Cubox, Arch Linux and here, but cannot
find the answer. I followed some nice guides to get my Cubox running
Arch Linux and Squeezelite, which is connected via the toslink cable to
my integrated amp. While I get decent sound, it is definitely not bit
perfect as when I
I've refrained from commenting on this thread for a while and don't want
to comment on some of the recent discussion, other than to thank Clive
for all his work on the CSOS.
I'm afraid the legal issues which Clive has identified distributing an
OS image also mean that I am personally not in a pos
snoozer wrote:
> Clive, let´s try it once more ...
>
First, please read the thread, the whole thread. Yes its very long, but
that is because it contains a lot of useful information. If you aren't
willing to invest your time to read a thread, why ask others to risk far
more than just their tim
bluegaspode wrote:
> Did I miss it or was it already explained what kind of legal trouble
> there is with the current image and it's distribution?
The last thing I need to be doing right now, is alerting people to where
is best to attack me, if they are so inclined.
I gave a "blueprint" of wha
erland wrote:
> I just want to be very clear that ickStream has nothing to do...
> ...anything that has happened to Clive personally.
Yep, it's true folks, Erland isn't having an affair with my wife! ;)
JackOfAll's Profil
mherger wrote:
> Triode,
>
> I have a plugin which pulls artwork from last.fm. On the Radio and Touch
>
> this seems to be ok. But on jivelite in HD mode I often wouldn't get the
>
> artwork. I guess that it's due to some timeout, as for the larger screen
>
> I'm pulling a higher resolution v
ag66 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone been able to use the Image Browser or Picture Gallery LMS
> plugins with Jivelite?
>
> I can go to Extras -> Image Browser -> Folders select the folder and
> will see the thumbnails for the images, but if I press Enter the image
> isn't opened (nothing happens).
Triode,
I have a plugin which pulls artwork from last.fm. On the Radio and Touch
this seems to be ok. But on jivelite in HD mode I often wouldn't get the
artwork. I guess that it's due to some timeout, as for the larger screen
I'm pulling a higher resolution version of the picture.
Do you kn
JackOfAll wrote:
> Contact Erland first and ask him if it is OK to "borrow" clauses 5 and 6
> from the ickStream NDA agreement. (Which you already have, because I
> know you are a BETA tester.)
>
Clive this is not directed to you, I'm just quoting your post to make it
easier for people to find y
Did I miss it or was it already explained what kind of legal trouble
there is with the current image and it's distribution?
Can you tell what party is troubling you and/or for what reason?
With that knowledge it would be much easier to understand the forces
behind the scenes and the probability
snoozer wrote:
> Clive, let´s try it once more ...
Believe me Clive is not trying to be rude or obstructive. He is trying
point out that the creation and distribution of Wandboard, or any other,
images has turned into a legal nightmare, and has even gone out of his
way to describe in some detai
snoozer wrote:
> Clive, let´s try it once more ...
>
Pepe,
I'm not being rude. I know what you need. And I'm trying to encourage
someone else to get you what you need, and cover their backside at the
same time.
Have a little patience, please. (And really, I'm sorry if you think I'm
being rude
Clive, let´s try it once more ...
I am a simple user, an individual, that just want some help on getting
an image for my new wandboard quad and that happens to have received it
just today. I am not familiar with all the stuff you mention, I just
want to rip the image in a single sd card and start
snoozer wrote:
> Suspicious man you are.
LOL. I'm sure people can read between the lines. (Well, some can.) It
might sound like I'm reading from a script, but I need to "trumpet the
party line" and then go on to suggest
Hint, hint If anyone does want to publicly re-distribute the F19
im
JackOfAll wrote:
> If you wish to join an "exclusive" club of people who want to sue me for
> having purchased a Wandboard on the promise of something that I am no
> longer distributing, (for a project I'm no longer involved in), PM me
> for my contact details. I am truly sorry!
I´d rather invit
snoozer wrote:
> I have just received my wandboard quad today and found out what´s going
> on with the project in the forum, very unfortunate indeed. Feel sorry
> for you JackOfAll, you have made such a great contribution to this
> project.
If you wish to join an "exclusive" club of people who w
I have just received my wandboard quad today and found out what´s going
on with the project in the forum, very unfortunate indeed. Feel sorry
for you JackOfAll, you have made such a great contribution to this
project.
In the meantime, and while the repo is hosted somewhere else, where
would I be
Clive,
It seems to me you have every right to be angry about recent
developments, and as far as I'm concerned you're the Saint ... but as
they say "it's enough to try the patience of a Saint" and how you've
managed to hold your tongue in public I really don't know.
F'wit is the right word. Sure
I know LMS on pure Android is discussed and in most cases there is no
need and big demand.
In my case:
- I have a new Odroid U3 to put all my mediaservers to one device.
- Squeezeplug 7 for Odroid, or deb installation on Ubuntu works very
good.
- XBMC on Android works smooth and is officially sup
Krisbee wrote:
> Even the repos have been withdrawn now, and so the project seems to have
> been brought to its knees.
Which Clive is working on, right now, to try and get a repo back up and
running, because whatever the rights and wrongs of any of this, the last
thing he ever wanted to see was
Krisbee wrote:
> But I have a direct question. The -*the protection of a limited
> liability company*- was mentioned. Would the creation of such an entity
> have avoided legal problems? Would you then have been able to create &
> distribute images for various ARM devices, host repos etc, fre
It's becoming clearer that Clive was keeping this project afloat against
all the odds, and at some personal cost, so it's a miracle it lasted
this long. With a less determined individual at the helm, it probably
would have folded long ago and we all owe him a debt of gratitude.
What a sad world
24 matches
Mail list logo
