Roland0 wrote:
> Your description is quite unclear. The gist of it seems to be that
> everything works, except accessing the LMS web interface from a device
> connected on 2.5 GHz.
> If that's correct, send a request (e.g. with wget) and check it's
> results and the connections (with netstat -a -
Hi All,
This may be of use to people wanting a case for a Pcp 3 LMS Server,
don't think it will work for HATs though.
https://nextcloud.com/box/
*Players:* SliMP3,Squeezebox3 x3,Receiver,SqueezePlayer,PiCorePlayer
x3,Wandboard
*Server:* LMS Version: 7.9.0 - 1475786002 on Centos 7 VM on ESXi
Wigster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Back in PCP 2.0x days, I installed the avahi extensions, so that I could
> find the player on my network using its name.
>
> Now that I have 3.02 installed, there doesn't seem to be the
> avahi-2.7.tcz extension available from the depository accessible through
> the web
Hi,
Back in PCP 2.0x days, I installed the avahi extensions, so that I could
find the player on my network using its name.
Now that I have 3.02 installed, there doesn't seem to be the
avahi-2.7.tcz extension available from the depository accessible through
the web UI. Is this because the extensi
bins wrote:
> However I can only connect Wifi devices to the LMS when I connect to the
> network on wl1, which is the 5Ghz one. If I connect on the 2.5Ghz one it
> never connects. LMS also has a web server, which is accessible on port
> 9000. Once again if I connect to it on the 5Ghz nic it's ok,
adamdea wrote:
> I see. Anyway does the audiophonics product suffer the same weakness as
> the others?
In general terms, IMHO, the Sabre design using on-chip ASRC with a
semi-decent single freq local OSC, will benefit less from Kali (or
re-clocking in general) than a PCM5xxx series design where
JackOfAll wrote:
> Maybe Greg or Scott, or someone who has used the HB DAC+ Pro in master
> mode without Kali, and compared to same DAC+ Pro in slave, but with
> Kali, can post their impressions.
>
> Since Allo called me a liar, I'm not inclined to want to say anything
> positive about any of th
A complete ignoramus here, but do the two frequencies operate on the
same SSID?
Perhap you can try the squeezebox stuff on a seperate 2.5Ghz SSID, they
only need to be b/g, I think.
atb
Ronnie
Man in a van's Profile: http
adamdea wrote:
> Perhaps someone will be able to publish some measurements demonstrating
> the superiority of the kali + slave solution for those boards.
> Does the same apply to the audiophonics product?
Maybe Greg or Scott, or someone who has used the HB DAC+ Pro in master
mode without Kali, a
JackOfAll wrote:
> Nail on the head. Both of the two "master" HAT boards that are
> commonly available are "flawed". (And no, I'm not going to expand on
> that! ;))
Perhaps someone will be able to publish some measurements demonstrating
the superiority of the kali + slave solution for tho
adamdea wrote:
> This would only make sense if the dac with a master clock has a really
> useless clock. IN that case I think you'd be better off buying a dac
> with a decent internal clock.
Nail on the head. Both of the two "master" HAT boards that are
commonly available are "flawed".
badboygolf16v wrote:
> I'm starting this thread as a request for information from JackOfAll. I
> thought it might be useful to have this information on a separate thread
> that others could easily find. I suspect there may be a reasonable
> amount of interest in the KALI Reclocker.
>
> Allo have
Hi all
I know this might not strictly be a squeezebox problem but I'm a bit
stumped. I've also posted this in the DDWRT forum fwiw,
I have an Asus RT87U, flashed with Firmware: DD-WRT v3.0-r30731 std
(10/06/16)
Apart from some static leases, everything is pretty much vanilla /
untouched from w
Thanks!
Seems to be working (not at home right now to check that there's any
sound coming out but all looks good remotely).
zntrx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2682
View this thread: http://for
Greg Erskine wrote:
> I do find commercial products based on voodoo immoral, maybe if people
> experimented with "free" voodoo they would be less likely to be conned?
Voodoo based on cluelessness is just as much voodoo as the voodoo based
on greed. "Let them experiment with it and see that it do
Your update installed Perl 5.24 - for which we don't have any binaries yet.
You could compile them yourself:
- clone https://github.com/Logitech/slimserver-vendor
- go to the CPAN folder
- run the buildme.sh script
--
Michael
___
unix mailing list
un
Greg Erskine wrote:
> Thanks. I have done this test myself with the same result, but it would
> be good for tweak promoters to include the same type of test.
>
> regards
> Greg
Most people see every day the results of variable cpu loading on a
digital playback system when watching blu ray rips o
I've been happily running SqueezeboxServer/LMS since Debian Lenny,
pretty much problem free.
For the last year or so I've been running Debian Stretch (testing),
again no problem.
Yesterday I did an dist-update to get a fix for the dirty cow bug and
now LMS is dead :(
I tried downloading the lat
18 matches
Mail list logo
