PasTim wrote:
> Do you mean you've never switched it on? Apart from being able to
> display some images what else can a Touch do apart from play music?
I got it just a few months before they were discontinued with the
intention of modifying the heck out of it... new clocks, power & output
mods,
sckramer wrote:
> Guys, so I dusted off the touch and added i2s out, pretty straight
> forward 30 min job. Doing some i2s work and need something other than a
> pi/kali/hifiberry as a source for testing.
>
> Posting here because saw there's some talk of MAC address filtering
> (Thanks!) ...also
Greg/Steen,
There is an interesting HW development available for I2S DACs on the
R-Pi now and I'm curious if you have incorporated it into your base
download...
The HiFiBerry DAC+ Pro has separate on-board clocks for the 44/48 family
of sampling rates and is using a clock master function of the
Triode wrote:
> Mainly because it offers all we need as a player only solution with a
> usb dac. Its got a real usb implementation which is much better than
> the Pi and also has more cpu power. It can run squeezelite and
> jivelite fine on its single core (which can be a stress for a Pi).
>
Kuro wrote:
> This arrangement works for me.
>
> BTW, is it possible to add a page called "Optimization"? What I want
> see on this page is the ability to disable/enable services. So if I
> don't need Samba, then I want to be able to disable it. I found that by
> running minimum number of bac
Erland,
Thanks for your response. I apologize for any of my post sounding like
demands... All of what I was/am asking are questions/requests and I did
not intend and hope I did not imply in any way that I expect that any of
the people mentioned were 'expected' to respond. They may or not... or
ma
Clive,
First, I want to again thank you for all the effort you put into the
Community Squeeze project. Even if it had just been the configuration,
release, and support of the image, that was a tremendous job and one
that I can't see how you ever had time for (along with eating and
sleeping, much
JackOfAll wrote:
> Pascal,
>
> Forgive me, but I'm going to ignore that question for the moment and
> pretend you never asked it.
>
> The problem is, I could give a one sentence answer but it will result in
> 20 more questions and a bunch of speculation. I don't have the time
> right now for
JackOfAll wrote:
>
>
> What I would like to try and do, is come up with a compromise, whereby
> we part-subsidise the beta boards, perhaps asking the early adopters,
> (a.k.a. beta testers), to contribute $200 to the CSP1 board cost, on the
> understanding that when we reach the CSP2 production
