+1 for Drew Wills. He's not only a skilled developer, but has a passion for
uPortal and the community.
-Gary
On Dec 18, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Carroll, Tim wrote:
I'd like to nominate Drew Wills. He is a long standing member of the
uPortal and broader Jasig community. He is very active on
I don't know if I am still a committer, think not but I would love to
vote +1.
Susan
On 1/17/2013 10:27 AM, Jim Helwig wrote:
Gary's email reminded me that I need to officially wrap up the
election process (which I neglected to do over the holidays).
We have only one nominee for the vacant
+1
I'm not a committer. I just wanted to through in my support for Drew's
nomination :)
Kostya
-Original Message-
From: bounce-26676606-58214...@lists.wisc.edu
[mailto:bounce-26676606-58214...@lists.wisc.edu] On Behalf Of Jim Helwig
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:28 AM
To:
Everyone,
I have accepted a position at another company (TASC: https://tasconline.com)
and my last day in the office at UW-Madison is Friday Jan 25.
I am still personally interested in the Jasig/Apereo community,
particularly Bedework, and I hope to contribute at some level on my own
personal
Hi Eric.
Thanks for the tip. swapping in :: for . and swapping it out did resolve
the truncated group issue for us.
That helped us rule it out and got us to the real issue. We have at least one
user, and maybe up to 100 users, in our system who are members of an abnormally
large number
Thanks for all your contributions, Nick. Good luck! (And I look forward
to any continued involvement you have with Apereo)
JimH
On 1/17/13 9:38 AM, Nicholas Blair wrote:
Everyone,
I have accepted a position at another company (TASC:
https://tasconline.com) and my last day in the office at
I don't know if I get a vote or not ;) but I 100% agree with Gary. +1
for Drew, he's gone above and beyond to help us implement uPortal at
Oakland with very innovative techniques.
Aaron
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Gary Thompson g...@unicon.net wrote:
+1 for Drew Wills. He's not only a
OK.
I'm waiting for a test user from our admin group (hope to have it later today)
with a large number of groups so we can verify that the issue still exists with
the truncated group fixed.
We're suspecting to still see the issue because the truncated groups have been
in our system since
Another thought I had, do you actually need all of these groups in the
portal? If not could you add an option to filter out groups from the
grouper service you don't care about in the group group service impl?
-Eric
On 1/17/13 11:39 AM, Bill Brown wrote:
OK.
I'm waiting for a test user
Hi.
We did think of that as well but it turns out that the bulk of his groups are
of a type being used for one of our high visibility portlets that lets staff
across the campus view billing account information for their department.
I'm thinking about trying to cut out the portal doing a
+1
-- Anthony.
On 17/01/13 15:27, Jim Helwig wrote:
Gary's email reminded me that I need to officially wrap up the election
process (which I neglected to do over the holidays).
We have only one nominee for the vacant developer representative on the
uPortal Steering Committee: the esteemed
one more I forgot to implement, hide tabs with no result.
2013/1/18 Viktors Jengovatovs viktors.jengovat...@gmail.com:
Hi!
There are my changes.
search.jsp and png preview are in attachment.
Main idea: In first tab (Summary Tab) located 2 results from every another
tab.
Now there are
12 matches
Mail list logo
