I'm using a stack written by someone else that's trying to call what
appears to be a built-in JSON library.
For example, it will call jsonImport() on some JSON, but won't find that
handler. The error says to check to see if the "com.livecode.library.json"
extension is checked in the standalone app
@Dick
Sure, I think we would be interested.
@ monte
Not sure if the above qualifies as use case… but may help ?
Our new app is very modular. Layout on disk looks like this
config.json
loader stack
# stack script initializes all back/front and lib required to app wide use
# as declare
I meant "can't run parallel"
Svasti Astu, Be Well
Brahmanathaswami
www.himalayanacademy.com
On 8/11/16, 3:08 PM, "use-livecode on behalf of Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami"
wrote:
So, since we know the behaviors can run parallel,
___
use-livecod
"I had tried indenting each level, but found it didn't provide that much
more clarity and preferred to keep linked behaviors at the same level"
So, since we know the behaviors can run parallel, your view means behavior 3 is
parent of 2? And behavior 2 is a patent of 1?
Swasti Astu! Be Well
( f
> On 12 Aug 2016, at 10:17 AM, Dick Kriesel wrote:
>
> A use case involves the script editor’s "Apply" button, whose events may
> matter to multiple development tools. When that button already has a
> behavior, the process for adding another also adds complexity and adverse
> side effects.
> On Aug 11, 2016, at 2:34 PM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami
> wrote:
>
> but looking for
>
> OBJECT A (with behaviors)
> behavior 1
> behavior 2
> bevaiour 3
>
> all with an "equal standing"
I have a library called "libBehaviorList" you could use to give any object a
list of
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
> With the current nesting setup we have the same ability to use multiple
> scripts to define a single class of objects, but much greater clarity with
> being able to know which will override/overload others.
Multiple inheritance can have i
Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
> Richard… tks for devolution I had it before but downloaded a fresh
> copy
If yours is v4 or later it should have an option to notify you of
updates automatically.
> fyi that image " devo-mpath-nested.png"
>
> button "Main Button"
>
> shows three assigned b
Richard… tks for devolution I had it before but downloaded a fresh copy.
fyi that image " devo-mpath-nested.png"
button "Main Button"
shows three assigned behaviors in parallel, not nested?
??
On 8/11/16, 12:26 PM, "use-livecode on behalf of Richard Gaskin"
wrote:
Here's a view with n
Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote:
> The hierarchical behavior method obfuscates the architecture in the
> sense that it is very hard to see the common parent behaviors that
> are "hiding" behind the other child behaviors.
That's a function of the tool, not a weakness in the language.
The Projec
agreed and done
http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18176
please add more if my description is insufficient.
Aloha!
BR
On 8/11/16, 11:40 AM, "use-livecode on behalf of Monte Goulding"
wrote:
Given the width it would probably be nice to support showing the full
behavior hierarc
> On 12 Aug 2016, at 7:34 AM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami
> wrote:
>
> The hierarchical behavior method obfuscates the architecture in the sense
> that it is very hard to see the common parent behaviors that are "hiding"
> behind the other child behaviors.
Given the width it would probably be
Monte: yes I was aware of that option… but looking for
OBJECT A (with behaviors)
behavior 1
behavior 2
bevaiour 3
all with an "equal standing". I can see how from the engine's point of view
this might be challenging vs a hierarchical/cascading layout.
ergo, answer is "no,
I took one of my brief forays into version 8 today--shorter even than usual.
The application browser window comes up, but it's completely empty--with a
dozen stacks loaded!
--
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
___
use-livecode mailing list
us
You can assign a behavior to a behavior object for common code you want to use
in multiple behaviors. The IDE does support it.
Cheers
Monte
Sent from my iPhone
> On 12 Aug 2016, at 7:10 AM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami
> wrote:
>
> Pursuant to the new text only script architecture possibiliti
Pursuant to the new text only script architecture possibilities:
e.g. Group "portal-links"
Can we assign more than 1 behavior to this(any) group(object)?
Rumors are that it is possible. But, the IDE does not support it. Or at least
the current property inspector UI as it looks today, does not s
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Jeanne A. E. DeVoto <
revolut...@jaedworks.com> wrote:
> set the textFont of char 1 to -1 of tgTg to empty
>
> That should work.
>
It did, it did!
I had been trying "char 1 to -1 of the text of tgTg", which I suppose gets
past the same way as "the text of" . .
At 11:28 AM -0700 8/11/2016, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
This code has been around a while; it's part of the maintenance routines.
But now it's glitching.
[...]
set the textFont of the text of tgTg to empty
"the text of tgTg" would be parsed as the text content of the field.
Try using this inst
I've had better results with:
set char 1 to -1 of the text of ...
> On Aug 11, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
>
> This code has been around a while; it's part of the maintenance routines.
> But now it's glitching.
>
> tgTg holds the long id of a field
>
> Inside a conditional, the last
This code has been around a while; it's part of the maintenance routines.
But now it's glitching.
tgTg holds the long id of a field
Inside a conditional, the last line of the code
set the txtFnt of tgTg to "ArialMt"
ck tgTg & cr & the long name of tgTg
set the textFont of the te
On 2016-08-11 17:32, Mike Kerner wrote:
or the difference between ++a and a++
and I didn't know, until yesterday, that "to" and "into" are synonyms.
I
freaked out when the syntax checker didn't yell at me for "put 1 to a",
until I tested it.
There's lots of synonyms lurking around like that
On Aug 11, 2016, at 11:37 AM, Matt Maier wrote:
> The way I've been tracking arrays in text for documentation purposes is
> basically just a table at heart:
>
> array[first-key][this-key] = whatever
> array[first-key][that-key] = foobar
> array[2nd-key][some-key] = data
> array[2nd-key][another-o
I second the vote for a YAML library. It makes text and arrays work
together a lot better than JSON.
The way I've been tracking arrays in text for documentation purposes is
basically just a table at heart:
array[first-key][this-key] = whatever
array[first-key][that-key] = foobar
array[2nd-key][so
or the difference between ++a and a++
and I didn't know, until yesterday, that "to" and "into" are synonyms. I
freaked out when the syntax checker didn't yell at me for "put 1 to a",
until I tested it.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.ru
The difference between "=" and "==" is something we LiveCoders never
need to worry about:
https://i.redd.it/nf19afmd7kex.jpg
:)
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
__
Quentin Long wrote:
> I don't know if there's a command that will do the job. However,
> there's a construction I use when I merge two list variables into one:
>
> put ItemList2 into item (1 + the number of items in ItemList1) of
> ItemList1
>
> That construction may seem a little weird, but it d
sez Matt Maier :
> Is there a command to merge two array variables into one?
>
> Example:
>
> tFirstArray[tom] = mot
> tFirstArray[jane] = enaj
>
> tSecondArray[bill] = llib
> tSecondArray[name] = eman
>
> put tSecondArray after tFirstArray
>
> tFirstArray[tom] = mot
> tFirstArray[jane] = ena
27 matches
Mail list logo
