Forget my question,
just noticed that these files are also in the win standalone. Seems to be
needed for the CEF browser.
Regards,
Matthias
> Am 06.05.2019 um 22:51 schrieb Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode
> :
>
> Hi,
>
> today i´ve created a Win,Mac and Linux standalone
Hi,
today i´ve created a Win,Mac and Linux standalone. The Linux folder contains
among the files i´ve expected also 3 other files:
natives_blob.bin (218KB)
snapshot_blob.bin (1,2MB)
icudtl.dat (10,2MB)
The file natives_blob.bin looks like a text file
The first lines look like this
mirrorsˆ
Hi,
i am no Linux expert, although i started my career in the 80s in a company
where we worked exclusively on Xenix and Unix. But that´s a long time ago.
So please excuse my question if it sounds dumbly.
I´ve created a Linux app on MacOSX. To get this app to run under Linux the
customer has
Hi Matthias,
You should be able to set the executable bit for a linux executable on
Mac OS X and preserve it with tar. Any standard tar cli utility will
honor the permissions when unpacking the file. There is no need to move
it to a Linux box first.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Hi Mark,
thanks for your answer. I am not sure how i can set that flag for Linux under
Mac OS X.
Using a ls -al on Mac OS X i can see that it has already the executable flag
set. But when i
compress it with tar and move it to Linux and untar it, then flag is not set
anymore.
Regards,
Hi Matthias,
What is the owner on Mac OS X? Does this owner exist on Linux? If not, you
might want to chmod a-x or use chown. I think that the tar man page contains
some useful info.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage:
Hi Matthias,
Check this tar option: --preserve-permissions
Should do the trick
Regards,
Thierry
2013/9/5 Matthias Rebbe matthias_livecode_150...@m-r-d.de
Hi Mark,
thanks for your answer. I am not sure how i can set that flag for Linux
under Mac OS X.
Using a ls -al on Mac OS X i can
Thanks Mark and Thierry for putting me in the right direction.
And yes, Thierry, that did it.
Thanks,
Matthias
Am 05.09.2013 um 16:18 schrieb Thierry Douez th.do...@gmail.com:
Hi Matthias,
Check this tar option: --preserve-permissions
Should do the trick
Regards,
Thierry
Richard, Mark, thanks for your continuing responses.
On 21/09/2011 16:37, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Ben Rubinstein wrote:
I need to go to particular cards, to avoid masses of rewriting of
this app which more normally runs with a GUI, as the scripts reference
controls and properties on different
On 09/25/2011 09:23 PM, Ben Rubinstein wrote:
Richard, Mark, thanks for your continuing responses.
On 21/09/2011 16:37, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Ben Rubinstein wrote:
I need to go to particular cards, to avoid masses of rewriting of
this app which more normally runs with a GUI, as the scripts
Ben-
Sunday, September 25, 2011, 11:23:40 AM, you wrote:
Surely the point is that all those operations should be - and AFAICT most are
- implemented with suitable checks to make sure there is a UI; and that the
assertion is revealing one which hasn't been. I just wondered if anyone else
On 21/09/2011 05:47, Mark Wieder wrote:
Ben-
Tuesday, September 20, 2011, 11:49:09 AM, you wrote:
I have one last (for now) issue, which is not a show stopper but which it
would be nice to fix. Whenever the stack goes to a card, I get
*** ASSERTION FAILURE: MCStack::openrect() - window ==
Ben Rubinstein wrote:
I have one last (for now) issue, which is not a show stopper but which it
would be nice to fix. Whenever the stack goes to a card, I get
*** ASSERTION FAILURE: MCStack::openrect() - window == NULL
Richard (I think) mentioned in a previous post that he hides the stack -
Thanks to Richard and Mark for previous assistance. I've now got my
standalone app running on Linux (system version 2.6.18-238.21.1.el5, but I've
no idea what that means or any other information about the flavour), compiled
with LC 4.6.4, with the -ui flag.
I'm using the trick that Richard
Ben-
Tuesday, September 20, 2011, 11:49:09 AM, you wrote:
I have one last (for now) issue, which is not a show stopper but which it
would be nice to fix. Whenever the stack goes to a card, I get
*** ASSERTION FAILURE: MCStack::openrect() - window == NULL
Richard (I think) mentioned in a
rather dreads the actual arrival of Duke Nukem. Lets hope
that never materializes either.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Linux-standalone-tp3249617p3250931.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Linux-standalone-tp3249617p3250931.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
finally, and that was a significant added feature.
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Linux-standalone-tp3249617p3250988.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use
I am working on the multi-platform distribution of a simple application that
uses revBrowser function. The mac standalone (development system too) is
working, Windows in about 95% (still haven't figured out how to handle
separators disabled items which seem to not work in Windows), but now
Mike Arnold wrote:
The Windows implementation of revBrowser had some interesting
unique differences and it seems Linux does too.
In particular, I create a substack and display a revBrowser window
there with 'in-memory' html, the new substack window is empty. Is
there something I must do
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 15:20 -0500, Mike Arnold wrote:
I am working on the multi-platform distribution of a simple application that
uses revBrowser function. The mac standalone (development system too) is
working, Windows in about 95% (still haven't figured out how to handle
separators
Warren Richard,
Thank you for your responses. Yep, right there in the doc it says that its
Windows Mac only. That is quite disappointing (but at least it is
documented, unlike a number of other mac vs windows behaviors).
Its not that I expect many (if any) linux users for this particular
a
.desktop file.
http://linuxcritic.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/anatomy-of-a-desktop-file/
Andre will know!
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Linux-standalone-distibution-tp3235370p3235701.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Linux-standalone-distibution-tp3235370p3235701.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode
- Original Message -
From: J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com
To: LiveCode Mailing List use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 9:25:28 PM
Subject: Linux standalone distibution
A couple of questions about distributing for Linux.
When I zip a standalone it loses its
I don't think I want to mess with a desktop file for the icon. Do apps ever
just ship with a jpg or a png in the folder? Then the user can choose that
if they want to customize.
It's pretty commonplace for apps that are not handled by some form of
package manager, to not have any kind of icon
On 1/25/11 1:24 PM, David C. wrote:
I don't think I want to mess with a desktop file for the icon. Do apps ever
just ship with a jpg or a png in the folder? Then the user can choose that
if they want to customize.
It's pretty commonplace for apps that are not handled by some form of
package
linux in for someone, this is one of the must cover things.
One day I must do a check list of the others.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Linux-standalone-distibution-tp3235370p3236957.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive
A couple of questions about distributing for Linux.
When I zip a standalone it loses its executable bit, and the user has to
manually set it after it's unzipped. Is there a way to compress a file
so that it remains executable?
Is there a way to stick an icon on the standalone so that it
29 matches
Mail list logo