Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-15 Thread Bob Earp
t; > To: How to use LiveCode > Subject: Re: Missing Digests > Message-ID: <507b3020.9050...@hyperactivesw.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > On 10/14/12 3:52 PM, Bob Earp wrote: >> I hate them for taking so much time to read, a

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-15 Thread Bob Sneidar
When I encounter useless drivel, or what I consider to be, I just delete it. That is why it's a great habit to develop, to use descriptive subjects. I'm not sure I would call anyone on the list a twit though. I get the distinct impression they are all much smarter than me... unless you were spe

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-14 Thread Mark Wieder
Jacque- Sunday, October 14, 2012, 2:29:05 PM, you wrote: > You know about this? : > Ugh. Nabble seems to have a better thread view than gmane, but gmane looks a lot better on the screen. Is there any way to strip out all the webby cruft? -- -M

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-14 Thread J. Landman Gay
know about this? : http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Missing-Digests-tp4656321p4656369.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-14 Thread RogGuay
.nabble.com/Missing-Digests-tp4656321p4656369.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-14 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 10/14/12 3:52 PM, Bob Earp wrote: I hate them for taking so much time to read, and doubly hate them when twits post totally useless drivel. I think I'm guilty of some of that. If you get the list as individual emails it's (maybe too) easy to post a quick reply, which encourages tangents. S

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-14 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 10/14/12 4:10 PM, Roger Guay wrote: I find that going to the archive by date is very convenient for monitoring the list, but of course you can't just point and click to reply from there. You know about this? : -- Jacqueline Landman Gay

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-14 Thread stephen barncard
Jerry Daniels made a list reader about 6 years ago. He'd make a weekly video and talk about Revolution topics from the list. It looked pretty basic, and an example of 'screen scraping', methinks. On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Bob Earp wrote: > Roger, > I am amazed how some folks on this list

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-14 Thread Roger Guay
I hear ya, Bob! I find that going to the archive by date is very convenient for monitoring the list, but of course you can't just point and click to reply from there. Honestly, I wouldn't know where to start to build such an interface. Cheers, Roger On Oct 14, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Bob Earp wro

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-14 Thread Bob Earp
Roger, I am amazed how some folks on this list manage to keep up with Digests, never mind individual posts. I seem to blink and three more digests appear in my InBox. The obviously don't sleep, have no lives, and have found the way to bend time ;-) Anyway, I have a love - hate relationship w

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-14 Thread Roger Guay
I tried Heather before posting to the list, but I got no answer! Roger On Oct 14, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Graham Samuel wrote: > Ironically I missed Roger's original post because I didn't get Digest 32, > which it was in - presumably! > > Recently FWIW I have missed several digests: 22, 25, 30 and

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-14 Thread Graham Samuel
Ironically I missed Roger's original post because I didn't get Digest 32, which it was in - presumably! Recently FWIW I have missed several digests: 22, 25, 30 and 32 to name recent ones. I guess I should write to Heather about it. Graham On un, 14 Oct 2012 08:40:52 -07000, Jim Lambert wrote:

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-14 Thread Roger Guay
Thanks, Jim. On Oct 14, 2012, at 8:40 AM, Jim Lambert wrote: > Roger wrote: >> >> I recently noticed that I quite often do not receive the list digest. For >> example, I did not receive issues 25, 28, and 30. Is anyone else >> experiencing this? > > Not me. All those digests arrived properly

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-14 Thread Jim Lambert
Roger wrote: > > I recently noticed that I quite often do not receive the list digest. For > example, I did not receive issues 25, 28, and 30. Is anyone else experiencing > this? Not me. All those digests arrived properly as they usually do. Jim Lambert

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-13 Thread Roger Guay
Thanks, Mark. Guess I'll have to do the same. > I went off digest mode some years ago for much this same reason. I > think if the mail server can't connect initially it doesn't retry. > > -- > -Mark Wieder > > ___ use-livecode mailing list use-live

Re: Missing Digests

2012-10-13 Thread Mark Wieder
Roger- Saturday, October 13, 2012, 10:13:43 AM, you wrote: > I recently noticed that I quite often do not receive the list > digest. For example, I did not receive issues 25, 28, and 30. Is > anyone else experiencing this? I went off digest mode some years ago for much this same reason. I think

Missing Digests

2012-10-13 Thread Roger Guay
Hi All, I recently noticed that I quite often do not receive the list digest. For example, I did not receive issues 25, 28, and 30. Is anyone else experiencing this? Thanks, Roger ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please vi