J. Landman Gay wrote:
>> On 2/7/2017 5:01 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote:
>>>>> Curiosity question: Do multiple nested groups (3 or 4 levels deep)
>>>>> affect CPU and memory performance? Are fewer nested groups easier
>>>>> on the e
>>>>
>>>>> Curiosity question: Do multiple nested groups (3 or 4 levels deep)
>>>>> affect CPU and memory performance? Are fewer nested groups easier
>>>>> on the engine?
>>>>
>>>> Because they effectively deepe
On 2/7/17 4:07 PM, Paul Dupuis via use-livecode wrote:
On 2/7/2017 5:01 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote:
On 2/7/17 2:13 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
J. Landman Gay wrote:
Curiosity question: Do multiple nested groups (3 or 4 levels deep)
affect CPU and memory
On 2/7/2017 5:01 PM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote:
> On 2/7/17 2:13 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
>> J. Landman Gay wrote:
>>
>>> Curiosity question: Do multiple nested groups (3 or 4 levels deep)
>>> affect CPU and memory performanc
On 2/7/17 2:13 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
J. Landman Gay wrote:
Curiosity question: Do multiple nested groups (3 or 4 levels deep)
affect CPU and memory performance? Are fewer nested groups easier
on the engine?
Because they effectively deepen the message path, I'd wager
J. Landman Gay wrote:
> Curiosity question: Do multiple nested groups (3 or 4 levels deep)
> affect CPU and memory performance? Are fewer nested groups easier
> on the engine?
Because they effectively deepen the message path, I'd wager there is
some difference, at least
Curiosity question: Do multiple nested groups (3 or 4 levels deep)
affect CPU and memory performance? Are fewer nested groups easier on the
engine?
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
