:-)
> John-
>
> Monday, July 4, 2011, 1:32:18 PM, you wrote:
>
> > A kodak and 'Lamb's Navy Rum' it is then...:-)
>
> Sheep have ships? Methinks Andre's not the only one who's been hitting
> the rum...
>
> --
> -Mark Wieder
> mwie...@ahsoftware.net
John-
Monday, July 4, 2011, 1:32:18 PM, you wrote:
> A kodak and 'Lamb's Navy Rum' it is then...:-)
Sheep have ships? Methinks Andre's not the only one who's been hitting
the rum...
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-livecode mailing l
A kodak and 'Lamb's Navy Rum' it is then...:-)
> CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!
>
> next conference... please bring a camera to record any brilliance that might
> or might not happen.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-l
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:25 PM, John Dixon wrote:
>
> Andre...:-)
>
> I would pay money to watch someone drink 3 pints of rum
>
CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!
next conference... please bring a camera to record any brilliance that might
or might not happen.
>
> > From: an...@andregarzia.com
>
> > the on
Andre...:-)
I would pay money to watch someone drink 3 pints of rum
> From: an...@andregarzia.com
> the only time my mind is brilliant is after 3 pints of rum, just before
> falling asleep, then I am brilliant but I never remember...
_
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
> And there I thought I was just not able to 'keep up' with
> your brilliant mind!
>
the only time my mind is brilliant is after 3 pints of rum, just before
falling asleep, then I am brilliant but I never remember...
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011
And there I thought I was just not able to 'keep up' with
your brilliant mind!
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Andre Garzia wrote:
> sometimes I am afraid that someone will actually read the code on
> RevOnRockets, specially the processrequest handler...
>
> that code is so full of hacks that w
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Chipp-
>
> Sunday, July 3, 2011, 8:30:17 PM, you wrote:
>
> > I can more understand developers protecting scripts when those scripts
> are
> > part of tools which don't end up inside the codebase of another
> developer's
> > project. For instan
Chipp-
Sunday, July 3, 2011, 8:30:17 PM, you wrote:
> I can more understand developers protecting scripts when those scripts are
> part of tools which don't end up inside the codebase of another developer's
> project. For instance it might be a good idea to protect a plugin script
> which acts as
Aren't all purchasers of a product like this developers by default? Why
would end users ever delve into application code? Certainly, I've never
tried looking at the source code for a commercial application, even when
available. And, mostly code in stacks can't be edited unless you're in an LC
IDE.
I'm just starting to consider this issue so glad it's being discussed. I
think protection of stacks that are incorporated into other products is
perhaps more to do with protecting them from end users rather than the
developers who incorporate them into their products. I would gladly give
the pass
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:51 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
> I agree we're a pretty good bunch. But I believe most or all the market
> vendors protect their scripts. Without that, it's too easy for someone to
> "lend" the script to someone else. I don't begrudge them a bit of
> protection, and it doe
Can't someone just lend the whole plugin? I know with altBrowser and
altSQLite and altFont, all you needed was a regcode and you were good to go.
I guess what I'm saying, is you're never going to stop the pirates. They
won't pay no matter what. Most of us in the commercial space know this and
we i
On 7/3/11 10:30 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:03 AM, John Craig wrote:
The scripts are protected - if I can generate some revenue from the plugin,
then I can dedicate time to developing it further.
I'm not sure exactly the correlation between scripts being protected and
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:03 AM, John Craig wrote:
>
>
> The scripts are protected - if I can generate some revenue from the plugin,
> then I can dedicate time to developing it further.
>
I'm not sure exactly the correlation between scripts being protected and
generating revenue from them. I've be
Hi, Chipp. I'm (unsurprisingly!) using the plugin. I don't mean that
as a joke - I actually started writing it to save me time on my own iOS
projects.
Other coders had a similar interest / need (feedback after a demo on
LiveCode.TV) so it has now developed into it's current form.
It works on b
Hi Chipp,
I gave it a try. I found a few problems and reported them. I think they have
been or are being fixed.
As far as I know, there is no tab bar.
The library is automatically added to any stack you are working on, if that
stack is in the front and you change a setting in the MobGUI palett
I believe this is called a tab bar in iOS:
http://www.glyfx.com/grfx/products/previews/iphone_common_preview.png
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Roger Eller wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
>
> > If you are, do you mind a few questions?
> >
> > 1. Does the exact sa
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
> If you are, do you mind a few questions?
>
> 1. Does the exact same MobGUI plugin work on both Mac and PC? IOW, if you
> have your plugins synchronized in Dropbox, will you be able to use it?
> 2. Are the scripts protected? Can you dive
19 matches
Mail list logo
